Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 18 → 30 of 75
1 category · Named, not rankedHockeyStack
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HockeyStack was named 1 time in SaaS metrics, where ChartMogul led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market32 of 78
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise56 of 109
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In saas metrics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HockeyStack for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 0% | 32 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HockeyStack held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · SaaS metrics · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 50 of 99, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 32 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HockeyStack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HockeyStack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for GTM & Pipeline Attribution: Dreamdata or HockeyStack” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HockeyStack, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HockeyStack was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HockeyStack, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HockeyStack was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HockeyStack. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named HockeyStack and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
baremetrics.com2
databox.com2
maxio.com2
reddit.com2
trustradius.com2
upsolve.ai2
a88lab.com1
blog.alguna.com1
blog.fintel-analytics.com1
chartmogul.com1
Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming HockeyStack came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hockeystack.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HockeyStack takes 0% of first choices and ChartMogul takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hockeystack.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HockeyStack takes 0% of first choices and ChartMogul takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “saas metrics tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “saas metrics dashboard”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“hockeystack”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 46 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,061 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 690 · 67 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,634
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 78 in saas metrics
Segment leader
49%
ChartMogul
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hockeystack.com
770
subdomains included
Content
292
counted in the table below
Documentation
336
Product · Integration
1 · 37
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 122 | undated | Financial reporting | ||
| Template or tool | 38 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 29 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | ||
| Report or ebook | 26 | 2 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Case study | 24 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 24 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 19 | 0 | 2025-05-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-22Lift analysis vs. multi touch attribution report or ebook
- 2026-07-20What is Source vs. Referrer vs. UTM Source vs. UTM Medium? | HockeyStack glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-13Attribution Lookback Window | HockeyStack report or ebook
- 2026-06-22Building a Basic Report | HockeyStack report or ebook
- 2026-06-22Different Attribution Models | HockeyStack report or ebook
- 2026-06-13What is the HubSpot "email bounces" action? | HockeyStack glossary or explainer
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 24, 2026GTMFund x HockeyStack Dinner @ Shinola NYCNew York City · hosted
- June 17, 2026GTMFund x HockeyStack Dinner @ Shinola SFSan Francisco · hosted
- June 11, 2026Sales Assembly x HockeyStack Revenue Leaders Chicago ExperienceChicago · hosted
- June 4, 2026Sales Assembly x HockeyStack Revenue Leaders NYC ExperienceNew York City · hosted
- May 28, 2026WNBA Game Night at Chase CenterSan Francisco · hosted
- May 21, 2026HockeyStack / SalesAssembly Revenue Leaders SF ExperienceSan Francisco · hosted
- May 19, 2026Gartner CSO & Sales Leader ConferenceLas Vegas · attended
- April 16, 2026HockeyStack's Launch PartySan Francisco · hosted
- March 26, 2026GTM in Style: A Designer Sneaker ExperienceSan Francisco · hosted
- March 19, 2026GTM in Style: A Designer Sneaker ExperienceNew York City · hosted
- March 5, 2026The Operator’s Table: a VP+ RevOps Leadership DinnerSan Francisco · hosted
- January 22, 2026The Perfect Mix: Cocktails, Conversation, and GTMSF Bay Area · hosted
- January 8, 2026Designing GTM Strategies That Stand OutNew York City · hosted
- November 18, 2025Breaking the Ice: GTM Insights That Actually WorkSF Bay Area · hosted
- November 6, 2025Pour One Out: The AI Mistakes in GTMNew York City · hosted
As the event pages on hockeystack.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hockeystack.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow HockeyStack
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HockeyStack is its own company.ShowHide
The company
HockeyStack is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI GTM - B2B Revenue Data Intelligence Platform
- For
- GTM and Revenue Operations (RevOps) teams
- Price stated
- Custom enterprise pricing hockeystack.com
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPA
- Hosting
- Frankfurt, Germany
- Customers named
- 8x8DicePlanhatActiveCampaignN8NRakutenJustworksFirstup
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What HockeyStack's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hockeystack.com, hockeystack.com/pricing, hockeystack.com/platform-overview, hockeystack.com/customers, hockeystack.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HockeyStack's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HockeyStack, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HockeyStack by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HockeyStack is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HockeyStack, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.