Every category where a model named iDenfy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AML and transaction monitoring	Tax and compliance	0%	37 of 108	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for iDenfy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated iDenfy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels2

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Suited to small businesses needing simple setup, affordable verification, screening, and basic reporting.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Described as not full AML and lacking sanctions data in the cited comparison.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as iDenfy, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iDenfy was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ondato14 of 212Not among the top eight

ComplyCube13 of 214Not among the top eight

ComplyAdvantage12 of 212Not among the top eight

Sanction Scanner10 of 215Not among the top eight

Flagright9 of 214Not among the top eight

NICE Actimize8 of 210Not among the top eight

Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management5 of 210Not among the top eight

SAS4 of 210Not among the top eight

Sumsub4 of 210Not among the top eight

AML Watcher3 of 210Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iDenfy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named iDenfy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com16

learn.g2.com15

ondato.com13

fraud.net11

thecfoclub.com11

sphinxhq.com10

amlwatcher.com8

guideflow.com8

sanctionscanner.com8

sourceforge.net8

108 of the 108 domain citations in answers naming iDenfy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-anti-money-laundering-software15

ondato.com/blog/best-aml-software12

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-aml-compliance-software11

g2.com/categories/anti-money-laundering10

sphinxhq.com/blog-posts/best-aml-software10

amlwatcher.com/blog/aml-software-vendors8

guideflow.com/blog/aml-software8

softwaresuggest.com/aml-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

idenfy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iDenfy takes 0% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110,000 a month (“idenfy”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 18 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 6,549 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,648 · 63 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 5,065
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

15 ads · 12 text, 3 image · 3 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2025, as UAB "iDenfy", verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 37 of 108 in AML monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ComplyAdvantage

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 21 answers
Its own site cited: in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on idenfy.com

900

subdomains included

Content

524

counted in the table below

Documentation

222

Product · Integration

27 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Blog	299	undated
Report or ebook	137	undated
Glossary or explainer	41	undated
News or press	31	undated
Comparison	14	undated
Case study	1	undated
Conference or event	1	undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

September 29, 2026 to October 1, 2026SBC Summit 2026Feira Internacional de Lisboa & MEO Arena, Lisbon, PT · exhibited

As the event pages on idenfy.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page idenfy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow iDenfy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

iDenfy is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Identity verification service for user onboarding. Mitigate fraud with instant ID verification. Meet Know Your Customer, AML regulations.
idenfy.com
For: businesses
idenfy.com
Price stated: Pay only per successful ID verification idenfy.com
Starting price: 1.35 idenfy.com
Free plan or trial: Try for free idenfy.com
Integrations claimed: 8 idenfy.com · 5000 idenfy.com/integrations pages disagree
Certifications: ISO 27001 certificate number ISMS-1851/AISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type IIeIDAS ComplianceGDPR compliantISO 27001
Hosting: EU
Customers named: PaysetCherry ServersHollaExGOAT FinanceBeera StationMano BankPonte FinanceCSGOWin

What iDenfy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: idenfy.com, idenfy.com/security, idenfy.com/use-cases, idenfy.com/customers, idenfy.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iDenfy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iDenfy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iDenfy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where iDenfy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name iDenfy, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.