AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › insightsoftware · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

insightsoftware

13Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. insightsoftware was named 4 times in Disclosure reporting and 1 other category, where Workiva led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In disclosure reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named insightsoftware for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SEC and disclosure reportingAccounting and close0%17 of 630%3under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32%
Financial consolidationAccounting and close0%97 of 102100%1under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for insightsoftware yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated insightsoftware across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“useful when teams need more format variety” Perplexity Sonar · Disclosure reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise tools like Planful or insightsoftware are pricier and less suited for tight budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as insightsoftware, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and insightsoftware was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workiva9 of 136Not among the top eight
DFIN ActiveDisclosure8 of 130Not among the top eight
Certent6 of 130Not among the top eight
IRIS CARBON4 of 130Not among the top eight
Planful3 of 130Not among the top eight
Anaplan2 of 131Not among the top eight
OneStream2 of 131Not among the top eight
Workday Adaptive Planning2 of 131Not among the top eight
Broadridge2 of 130Not among the top eight
Certent Disclosure Management2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named insightsoftware. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named insightsoftware and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

houseblend.io9
cfoshortlist.com7
insightsoftware.comYour site7
gitnux.org6
learn.g2.com6
dfinsolutions.com5
worldmetrics.org5
grctools.net4
tax.thomsonreuters.com4
workiva.com4

Fifty of the fifty-seven domain citations in answers naming insightsoftware came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on insightsoftware.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
8,488
counted in the table below
Documentation
39
Product · Integration
142 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog7,736undatedLease accounting, Financial consolidation
Case study497undatedLease accounting
Comparison9802026-03-20Account reconciliation
Glossary or explainer4602026-02-05Account reconciliation, Cash flow forecasting
Webinar or virtual event4502026-02-23
Conference or event2502025-10-15
Template or tool2202022-01-20
Report or ebook13undated
News or press4undated
Podcast or video202025-03-23
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page insightsoftware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name lease accounting (88); 8 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as insightsoftware

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as insightsoftware; a claim can dispute any of them.
Certent/InsightSoftware 1Insightsoftware 1

Follow insightsoftware

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

insightsoftware is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Finance-owned software that leverage your existing financial systems to speed-up processes, increase accuracy, and encourage wider participation.
For
finance, HR, and technology leaders
Price stated
Get pricing with a Sales Expert insightsoftware.com
Integrations claimed
140 insightsoftware.com
Certifications
ISO 9001ISO 27001ISO 42001SOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IICCPAGDPR
Customers named
Sizzling PlatterEndavaSalesforceAVR Realty CompanyBuyInPatientPointPatientPoint®Groupe Rossignol
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What insightsoftware's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: insightsoftware.com, insightsoftware.com/pricing-request, trust.insightsoftware.com, insightsoftware.com/solutions/xpa, insightsoftware.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when insightsoftware's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as insightsoftware, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for insightsoftware by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where insightsoftware is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name insightsoftware, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at insightsoftware.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.