Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 87 → 96 of 96
10 categories · RankedOneStream
503Judge labels
65First choices
130Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
10Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
63% in Financial consolidation for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 102 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 37 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OneStream →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business100 of 100
0%20 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market7 of 102
2%37 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 82
63%62 labels
endorsed leader
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OneStream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 2% | 7 of 102 | 30% | 37 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 94 of 99 | 45% | 42 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 59 of 74 | 41% | 22 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 17 of 85 | 25% | 16 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 0% | 23 of 102 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 21% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 40 of 105 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 22 of 82 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 70 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Excel at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 64 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| SEC and disclosure reporting | Accounting and close | 0% | 46 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32% |
Movement
Since September 2026, OneStream held within the floor in all ten categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 19 → 7 of 99
Enterprise▼−16Since September 2026: 78% → 63%, −16 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
63%from 78% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 6 pointsRank 1 of 75, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | 5% | 0% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 23 of 102 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 7 of 102 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 94 of 99 |
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 59 of 74 |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 17 of 85 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 98 → 40 of 105 |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 22 of 82 |
| Financial modeling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 77, unchanged |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 77, unchanged |
| Disclosure reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 46 of 63, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OneStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OneStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 12 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 16 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 17 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 11 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct93 labels26
Paraphrase56 labels17
Comparative113 labels23not counted in share
Budget-constrained91 labels18
Scale-constrained62 labels4
Negative88 labels8not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative503 labels in all, every segment counted; 65 of the 96 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“OneStream – best for complex enterprise CPM on one platform ... The ISG Financial Consolidation Buyers Guide 2025 finds OneStream atop the list” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice
“OneStream offers end-to-end management in a unified platform, eliminating the complexity of multiple solutions, interfaces and integrations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“All-in-one CPM platform that replaces fragmented legacy tools like Oracle Hyperion components; ... Enterprise → OneStream, Oracle, or SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose OneStream if you are a mature organization tired of managing five different spreadsheets and disconnected databases.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: Enterprise platforms like Anaplan or OneStream ... they're overkill for most mid-market companies” Kimi K2 · FP&A platforms · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“OneStream | Enterprise-grade pricing with custom quotes that lean heavily toward larger organizations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“"Avoid large enterprise platforms like Anaplan or OneStream if budget is the main constraint"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Anaplan, OneStream, or Oracle EPM Cloud if you have a limited budget” Kimi K2 · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneStream, over the 503 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneStream was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneStream, over the 503 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneStream was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneStream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 478 of the 503 answers that named OneStream and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
prophix.com161
onestream.comYour site144
g2.com136
guideflow.com135
learn.g2.com130
cubesoftware.com123
bluecopa.com117
drivetrain.ai103
highradius.com102
maxima.ai101
1,108 of the 1,252 domain citations in answers naming OneStream came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
onestream.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OneStream takes 2% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
onestream.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OneStream takes 2% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consolidation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial consolidation software”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“onestream”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 703 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 32,233 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,479 · 380 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,954
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $36 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 102 in financial consolidation
Segment leader
24%
Prophix
- First choices
- 65 across its categories
- Named in
- 503 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 478 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on onestream.com
3,354
subdomains included
Content
1,719
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,303
Product · Integration
57 · 30
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,204 | undated | |||
| News or press | 233 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 105 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 41 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 35 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 33 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Conference or event | 29 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 24 | undated | |||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-02Generators template or tool
- 2026-07-02The onestream podcast archive now lives in the community 8491 podcast or video
- 2026-04-22BodyGeneratorPackagesContext template or tool
- 2026-04-22BodyGeneratorPbmDto template or tool
- 2026-04-22DataTableColumnInfoContext template or tool
- 2026-04-22DataTableContext template or tool
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 11, 2026OneStream World TourKIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam · hosted
- June 9, 2026OneStream World TourFábrica de Tapices, Madrid · hosted
- June 4, 2026OneStream World TourTobacco Dock, London · hosted
- June 2, 2026OneStream World TourPalais Brongniart, Paris · hosted
- May 18, 2026 to May 20, 2026OneStream Splash OrlandoWalt Disney World Swan and Dolphin Resort, Orlando · hosted
As the event pages on onestream.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page onestream.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as OneStream
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OneStream; a claim can dispute any of them.
OneStream Software 3OneStream XF 1Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik/OneStream 1
Follow OneStream
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OneStream is its own company.ShowHide
The company
OneStream is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI operating system for modern Finance
- For
- Finance
- Free plan or trial
- Free, Personal Demo onestream.com/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 250 onestream.com/platform
- Certifications
- FedRAMP High AuthorizationSSAE18 SOC 1 and 2 Type 2ISO 27001 CertificationFedRAMP HIGH & DoD DOSA IL4
- Customers named
- Cox EnterprisesComcastGeneral DynamicsCostcoKLMKoenig & BauerBrenntagRémy Cointreau
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What OneStream's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onestream.com, trust.onestream.com, onestream.com/platform, onestream.com/case-studies, onestream.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneStream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneStream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneStream by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OneStream is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OneStream, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.