Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 106 of 111, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedKinaxis
5Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Kinaxis was named 2 times in Supplier management and 1 other category, where Precoro led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business111 of 117
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market58 of 111
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Kinaxis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 58 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 60 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Kinaxis held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Supplier management · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 52 of 107, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 111, unchanged |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 83 → 60 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Kinaxis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Kinaxis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Mid-market manufacturers needing integrated planning and supplier communication” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative
“For a more holistic supply chain solution, e2open or Kinaxis may be better.” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kinaxis, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kinaxis was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kinaxis, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kinaxis was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kinaxis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Kinaxis and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindsprint.com4
ramp.com3
shopify.com3
techfundingnews.com3
noxus.ai2
softwareadvice.com2
softwareconnect.com2
agicap.com1
bill.com1
caddi.com1
Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Kinaxis came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on kinaxis.com
1,197
subdomains included
Content
1,187
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,128 | 49 | 2026-09-29 | Treasury management syst | |
| News or press | 24 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | Treasury management syst | |
| Case study | 14 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Fy26 q3 comm veolia blog
- 2026-09-28Cpg luxury industry blog
- 2026-09-17Cardinal health case study 2026 case study
- 2026-09-16Ebook the ai aftershock report or ebook
- 2026-09-15Kinaxis advances operational orchestration vision agentic ai kinexions news or press
- 2026-09-09Pattern recognition agent design what remix cohort 2 winners showed us blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page kinaxis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Kinaxis
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Kinaxis is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Kinaxis is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The supply chain decision platform
- For
- the world's most complex organizations
- Certifications
- SOC1 Type IISOC2 Type IIBSI-C5 Type IIISO 27001:2022Cloud Security Alliance Trusted Cloud ProviderSTAR Registry level 1
- Hosting
- North AmericaEuropeAsia
- Customers named
- Schneider ElectricVolvo CarsUnileverBATCardinal HealthEcolabCreation TechnologiesInfineum
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Kinaxis's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: kinaxis.com, kinaxis.com/en/security, kinaxis.com/en/platform-maestro-25, kinaxis.com/customers, kinaxis.com/en/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kinaxis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kinaxis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kinaxis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Kinaxis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kinaxis, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.