Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 18 → 156 of 158
4 categories · RankedJaggaer
198Judge labels
2First choices
43Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Strategic sourcing for mid-market buyers
Rank 13 of 128 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Jaggaer →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business164 of 166
0%13 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market13 of 128
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 77
2%47 labels
accepted challenger
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Jaggaer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 2% | 13 of 128 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 17 of 87 | 25% | 20 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 32 of 111 | 29% | 17 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 30 of 46 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Jaggaer held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 13 of 120, unchanged
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 of 128, unchanged |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 17 of 87 |
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 32 of 111 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 46, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Jaggaer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Jaggaer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labelsNone
Paraphrase19 labelsNone
Comparative66 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labelsNone
Scale-constrained33 labels2
Negative30 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative198 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Look for: A specialized mid-market solution (like Jaggaer, Ivalua, Proactis, or even cloud-first contenders like Spendwise).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · first choice
“A strategic sourcing powerhouse, especially for complex manufacturing and direct spend.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall broad suite: Coupa, Ivalua, SAP Ariba, JAGGAER, GEP” GPT-5.4 mini · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · first choice
“Sourcing-focused SRM; e-procurement, supplier portals, advanced analytics. Good for public sector/education.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“frequently cited in procurement circles for having usability issues that frustrate both buyers and suppliers for years” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid - Enterprise solutions like Jaggaer — Start at ~$45,000/year, far beyond limited budgets” Kimi K2 · Supplier management · budget prompt · hard negative
“the biggest mistake is choosing a heavyweight enterprise platform (like SAP Ariba, Coupa, or Jaggaer)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“"Our own rollout of Jaggaer cost $120 k in annual licensing, but the services team charged $210 k for configuration, data migration, and custom workflow scripting."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Procure-to-pay · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jaggaer, over the 198 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jaggaer was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jaggaer, over the 198 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jaggaer was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jaggaer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 181 of the 198 answers that named Jaggaer and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
spendflo.com85
g2.com71
mindsprint.com60
guideflow.com59
payhawk.com38
suplari.com37
softwareadvice.com36
ivalua.com35
ramp.com34
gartner.com33
488 of the 488 domain citations in answers naming Jaggaer came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jaggaer.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jaggaer takes 2% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
jaggaer.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jaggaer takes 2% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“jaggaer”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 218 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 21,919 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,832 · 186 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,202
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $82 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 198 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 181 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jaggaer.com
2,943
subdomains included
Content
1,178
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
40 · 42
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 487 | undated | |||
| News or press | 346 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 152 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 92 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 53 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 22 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 11 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated |
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 3, 2026 to November 4, 2026Reuters Sourcing & Procurement USA 2026Houston · hosts
- November 18, 2026 to November 19, 2026HCSA Conference 2026Telford, United Kingdom
As the event pages on jaggaer.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jaggaer.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Jaggaer
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jaggaer; a claim can dispute any of them.
JAGGAER 18JAGGAER ONE 2JAGGAER One 2Jaggr 1
Follow Jaggaer
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Jaggaer is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Jaggaer is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Source to Pay Software | Jaggaer AI-Powered S2P Solutions
- For
- manufacturing, public sector, higher education, healthcare, services, wholesale, energy & utilities, and transportation & warehousing
- Integrations claimed
- 40 jaggaer.com
- Certifications
- SSAE18SOC 1SOC 2ISOISO 42001GDPR
- Customers named
- TK ElevatorGlobal manufacturing customerLife sciences customerEnterprise services customer
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Jaggaer's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jaggaer.com, jaggaer.com/trustcenter/security, jaggaer.com/solutions/jai, jaggaer.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jaggaer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jaggaer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jaggaer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Jaggaer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jaggaer, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.