Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 92 → 49 of 107
LogicGate · 1 category · RankedLogicGate Risk Cloud
29Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Internal controls for enterprise buyers
Rank 22 of 90 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LogicGate Risk Cloud →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business37 of 111
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 90
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise12 of 64
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LogicGate Risk Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 22 of 90 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LogicGate Risk Cloud held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Internal controls · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 6 → 21 of 88
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 17 → 12 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 22 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LogicGate Risk Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LogicGate Risk Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative16 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ideal for mid-market organisations that want fast, no-code workflow automation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
“Risk\u2011driven orgs | Strong risk management with control testing and remediation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“a highly visual, no-code GRC platform built for the mid-market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for: Configurable, no-code compliance programs” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogicGate Risk Cloud, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogicGate Risk Cloud was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogicGate Risk Cloud, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogicGate Risk Cloud was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LogicGate Risk Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named LogicGate Risk Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
sprinto.com16
v-comply.com14
wifitalents.com14
gitnux.org13
metricstream.com13
riskwatch.com13
supervizor.com13
worldmetrics.org13
gartner.com12
itechguides.com12
133 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming LogicGate Risk Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
logicgate.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LogicGate Risk Cloud takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
logicgate.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LogicGate Risk Cloud takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “internal controls tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sox compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“logicgate risk cloud”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Its company's site
- logicgate.ai shared with LogicGate's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 421 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 286 · 15 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,100
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 90 in internal controls
Segment leader
25%
FloQast
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 29 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LogicGate Risk Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
LogicGate 5LogicGate (Risk Cloud) 2
Follow LogicGate Risk Cloud
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogicGate Risk Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogicGate Risk Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LogicGate Risk Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LogicGate Risk Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LogicGate Risk Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.