| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 23 of 90 | 17% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 103 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 23 of 90 |
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 74 → 103 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Vanta – Best for teams needing continuous evidence collection and traceable control testing workflows, especially for SOX and ICFR compliance.” Mistral Small · Internal controls · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you are a B2B tech company trying to win enterprise deals and need SOC 2/ISO 27001 ASAP: Go with Vanta or Drata.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Vanta if you want a lighter-weight, automation-first platform and also care about other compliance frameworks.” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal controls · direct prompt · alternative
“I'd also compare Vanta if your main goal is automating security-compliance evidence and technical checks” GPT-6 Luna · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Vanta \u2014 starts around $10,000/year (SOC 2 only), and SOX adds significantly more” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · budget prompt · hard negative
“These are compliance automation tools, not full control management suites. Good starting point, but they don't run internal audit programs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Note: While great for IT, make sure they support the financial testing workflows your SOX auditors will require.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · scale prompt · soft negative
“Issues with incomplete integrations, unclear remediation guidance, and high pricing for smaller teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 54 answers that named Vanta and are not a share of its labels.
135 of the 156 domain citations in answers naming Vanta came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 812 | 78 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 245 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Case study | 116 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 96 | 2 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Comparison | 50 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 41 | 13 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 27 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 11 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on vanta.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page vanta.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Vanta's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: vanta.com, vanta.com/pricing, trust.vanta.com, vanta.com/products/ai, vanta.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vanta's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vanta, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Vanta by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: