Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 76 of 94, unchanged
Diligent · 3 categories · RankedDiligent One Platform
63Judge labels
6First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Internal controls for enterprise buyers
Rank 14 of 81 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Diligent One Platform →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business80 of 99
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 81
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise4 of 89
5%4 labels
under the label threshold
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Diligent One Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 2% | 14 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 20 of 90 | 11% | 19 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Board portals | Equity and corporate | 0% | 30 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 49% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Diligent One Platform held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Entity management · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 12 of 79, unchanged
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 23 → 4 of 77
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 20 of 90 |
| Entity management | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 81, unchanged |
| Board portals | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 50, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Diligent One Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Diligent One Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels5
Comparative23 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Primary Recommendation: Diligent One (Specifically Diligent Entities + Boards)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Ideal for SOX and internal audit teams that need traceable testing evidence and issue remediation workflows at scale.” Mistral Small · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
“HighBond is the strongest fit for SOX and internal controls teams that need traceable testing evidence” Muse Glimmer 30B · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose HighBond if you need to statistically analyze data to prove control failures.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“typically starts at $25,000–$50,000 per year based on brokered contract medians, which is often too steep for SMBs or startups” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · budget prompt · soft negative
“More GRC-heavy; better for larger mid-market.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Diligent One Platform, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent One Platform was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Diligent One Platform, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent One Platform was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diligent One Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 62 answers that named Diligent One Platform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
worldmetrics.org25
itechguides.com23
optro.ai20
zipdo.co19
riskwatch.com18
sprinto.com18
diligent.comYour site15
gitnux.org15
riskpublishing.com15
gartner.com13
166 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Diligent One Platform came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
diligent.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Diligent One Platform takes 2% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
diligent.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Diligent One Platform takes 2% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “entity management tools”
3
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“diligent one platform”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Its company's site
- diligent.com shared with Diligent's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 317,551 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,994 · 2,292 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,276
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 21 clicks and $287 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 62 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 59 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Diligent One Platform
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diligent One Platform; a claim can dispute any of them.
Diligent HighBond 5Diligent 4Diligent One 3HighBond (Diligent) 2Diligent HighBond (formerly Galvanize) 1Diligent One (HighBond) 1Diligent One (Specifically Diligent Entities + Boards) 1HighBond 1HighBond (by Diligent) 1
Follow Diligent One Platform
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Diligent is the company behind Diligent One Platform.ShowHide
The company
Diligent is the company behind Diligent One Platform.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Diligent
- Diligent Boards, Diligent Corporation, Diligent ESG, Diligent Entities, Diligent Equity
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the singular solution to streamline your GRC practice, unify risk perspectives, and offer powerful insights, all in one view
- For
- boards, committees, and executives
- Price stated
- Request pricing diligent.com/platform/diligent-one
- Integrations claimed
- 100 diligent.com/platform/diligent-one
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting, customers
What Diligent One Platform's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: diligent.com/platform/diligent-one, diligent.com/lp/diligent-one-platform, diligent.com/lp/diligent-one-does-that, diligent.com/lp/the-diligent-one-platform, diligent.com/lp/get-ready-for-the-diligent-one-platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent One Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent One Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Diligent One Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Diligent One Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Diligent One Platform, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.