Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 39 of 107, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedLogicManager
9Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LogicManager was named 5 times in Internal controls, where FloQast led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business42 of 111
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 90
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise28 of 64
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LogicManager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 4% | 12 of 90 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LogicManager held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Internal controls · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 25 → 9 of 88
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 32 → 25 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 12 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LogicManager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LogicManager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Onspring and LogicManager are particularly recommended” Mistral Small · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“### 1. The Top Recommendation: LogicManager” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LogicManager is recommended for mid-market companies looking for a taxonomy-based approach to risk” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Taxonomy-based risk/controls with white-glove support; better if you need consulting.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if Budget < $10K/year: Enterprise tools like BlackLine or LogicManager, as they skew higher.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogicManager, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogicManager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogicManager, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogicManager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LogicManager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named LogicManager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
sprinto.com7
gitnux.org5
mitti.com5
gartner.com4
itechguides.com4
metricstream.com4
supervizor.com4
v-comply.com4
finance-ai-index.com3
riskwatch.com3
Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming LogicManager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
logicmanager.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LogicManager takes 4% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
logicmanager.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LogicManager takes 4% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “internal controls tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sox compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“logicmanager”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 8,388 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,839 · 145 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,936
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 12 of 90 in internal controls
Segment leader
25%
FloQast
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 9 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on logicmanager.com
413
subdomains included
Content
346
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
13 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 216 | 3 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 30 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 26 | undated | |||
| News or press | 23 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | undated | |||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 11 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 9 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Separation of duties matter blog
- 2026-08-25Your product is talking are you listening blog
- 2026-08-20Financial confidence is built before the numbers blog
- 2026-06-23The risk pattern was there the report missed it blog
- 2026-05-21Customer risk signals blog
- 2026-05-18When engineering metrics reveal business risk blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page logicmanager.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow LogicManager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LogicManager is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LogicManager is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enterprise Risk Management Software
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- fixed-price model logicmanager.com
- Free plan or trial
- 90-Day Unconditional Satisfaction Guarantee logicmanager.com/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 7000 logicmanager.com/platform
- Certifications
- SOXHIPAAGDPR
- Hosting
- multi-region deployment
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, customers
What LogicManager's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: logicmanager.com, logicmanager.com/pricing, logicmanager.com/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogicManager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogicManager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LogicManager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LogicManager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LogicManager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.