Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 15 → 14 of 107
3 categories · RankedOnspring
26Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Internal controls for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 90 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Onspring →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business14 of 111
1%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market4 of 90
6%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise36 of 64
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Onspring for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 6% | 4 of 90 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 40 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| SEC and disclosure reporting | Accounting and close | 0% | 47 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Onspring held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Internal controls · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 10 → 4 of 88
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 13 → 33 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 2% | 7% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 4 of 90 |
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 81, unchanged |
| Disclosure reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 63, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Onspring across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Onspring across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels3
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Onspring and LogicManager are particularly recommended due to their scalability, strong internal controls features” Mistral Small · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“### 1. Onspring - Specifically designed for mid-market companies (200-2,000 employees)” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Onspring as a strong internal controls management tool” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“award-winning GRC automation and reporting software is competitively priced and known for flexibility and ease of use” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal controls · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Onspring, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onspring was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Onspring, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onspring was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Onspring. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 26 answers that named Onspring and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gitnux.org11
itechguides.com10
riskpublishing.com10
riskwatch.com9
finance-ai-index.com8
planetcompliance.com8
worldmetrics.org8
zipdo.co8
mitti.com7
sourceforge.net7
Eighty-six of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Onspring came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
onspring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Onspring takes 6% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
onspring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Onspring takes 6% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “internal controls tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sox compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“onspring”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 25 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,536 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,707 · 75 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,140
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 90 in internal controls
Segment leader
25%
FloQast
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 26 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on onspring.com
488
subdomains included
Content
365
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
28 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 222 | 28 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 55 | 6 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Case study | 33 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 4 | 2026-12-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-05-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2023-12-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-12-07Q4 onspring essentials training december 2026 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-11-18Workflow bootcamp training november 2026 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-21Q4 survey bootcamp october 2026 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28How grc workflow automation helps compliance teams adapt faster blog
- 2026-09-24Resources blog automate security assessments vendors systems controls blog
- 2026-09-24Grc software switching costs blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page onspring.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Onspring
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Onspring is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Onspring is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated Business Process Solutions; Strategic GRC Software for Your Enterprise; a flexible, cloud-based GRC platform that connects and monitors all of your business-critical functions, processes, and information
- For
- Your Enterprise; Government; GRC teams
- Price stated
- Flexible Pricing onspring.com/products
- Certifications
- FedRAMP Certified Class C (fka Moderate Authorized)
- Customers named
- The University of Kansas Health SystemWarner Bros. DiscoveryGoTo Foods
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Onspring's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onspring.com, trust.onspring.com, onspring.com/products, onspring.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Onspring's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Onspring, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Onspring by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Onspring is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Onspring, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.