AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › MaxMind · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

MaxMind

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MaxMind was named 2 times in Ecommerce fraud, where SEON led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce fraud · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MaxMind for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Ecommerce fraud preventionReceivables and billing0%26 of 700%2under 10 labels · led by SEON at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MaxMind yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MaxMind across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want to build your own custom logic: Choose MaxMind or Sift.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · alternative
“Add a cheap add-on (MaxMind) if you need more insight.” MiniMax M2.5 · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MaxMind, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MaxMind was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Riskified2 of 21Not among the top eight
Signifyd2 of 21Not among the top eight
Kount2 of 20Not among the top eight
Sift2 of 20Not among the top eight
Stripe Radar1 of 21Not among the top eight
Chargeflow1 of 20Not among the top eight
ClearSale1 of 20Not among the top eight
Forter1 of 20Not among the top eight
Fraudulytics1 of 20Not among the top eight
PayPal Fraud Protection1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MaxMind. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 2 answers that named MaxMind and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

accertify.com1
chargeback.io1
chargeflow.io1
cside.com1
fraud.net1
g2.com1
gitnux.org1
intelligenthq.com1
linkedin.com1
maxmind.comYour site1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming MaxMind came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on maxmind.com
876
subdomains included
Content
104
counted in the table below
Documentation
181
Product · Integration
9 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog10032026-09-23
Case study2undated
Comparison2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page maxmind.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as MaxMind

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MaxMind; a claim can dispute any of them.
MaxMind (minFraud) 1

Follow MaxMind

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

MaxMind is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Create smarter, safer digital experiences with accurate data; Foundational GeoIP®, proxy, and fraud intelligence for online businesses
For
online businesses
Price stated
as low as $0.005 per query, no monthly minimum, and no commitment maxmind.com
Starting price
0.005 maxmind.com
Free plan or trial
Try it for free. Free trial and versions available. maxmind.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II certifiedGDPR & CCPA compliant data
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting, customers

What MaxMind's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: maxmind.com, maxmind.com/en/solutions/compliance, maxmind.com/en/solutions/compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MaxMind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MaxMind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MaxMind by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where MaxMind is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name MaxMind, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at maxmind.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.