Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 57 → 53 of 59
Nakisa · 1 category · RankedNakisa Lease Administration
69Judge labels
16First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
32% in Lease accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 28 of 71 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Nakisa Lease Administration →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business or mid-market.
Small business64 of 67
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 71
0%13 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 70
32%50 labels
endorsed leader
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Nakisa Lease Administration for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 28 of 71 | 38% | 13 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Nakisa Lease Administration held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Lease accounting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 17 → 45 of 64
Enterprise▲+9Since September 2026: 24% → 33%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
33%from 24% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 1 of 65, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 28 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Nakisa Lease Administration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Nakisa Lease Administration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels6
Paraphrase15 labels7
Comparative18 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained8 labels2
Negative12 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise-oriented, supporting property, equipment, land and fleet leases, with multi-standard accounting and native ERP integrations” GPT-6 Luna · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“specializes in Fortune 1000 lease portfolios with native bidirectional SAP, Oracle, and Workday integration” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Nakisa Lease Accounting is worth considering because it is highlighted for multi-GAAP support” Perplexity Sonar · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“choose Nakisa for global, high-volume, multi-entity SAP environments with lessor/lessee needs” Muse Glimmer 30B · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you also want to avoid heavy, overly complex enterprise-level software (like Nakisa or CoStar) that requires a six-figure implementation budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · scale prompt · soft negative
“Mixed Reviews: Generally well-regarded but with some reported issues - Bugs: Occasional bugs that can interrupt workflow” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“you want to avoid heavy, over-engineered enterprise platforms (like CoStar or Nakisa)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · direct prompt · soft negative
“Nakisa scores ~3.9/5 on some sites, with complaints about complexity.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nakisa Lease Administration, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nakisa Lease Administration was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nakisa Lease Administration, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nakisa Lease Administration was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nakisa Lease Administration. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 69 answers that named Nakisa Lease Administration and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
nakisa.comYour site42
debtbook.com38
finquery.com38
prophix.com38
softwareconnect.com36
guideflow.com35
trullion.com30
capterra.com29
finantrix.com29
g2.com28
301 of the 343 domain citations in answers naming Nakisa Lease Administration came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
nakisa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nakisa Lease Administration takes 0% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
nakisa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nakisa Lease Administration takes 0% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lease accounting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “lease accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“nakisa lease administration”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- nakisa.com shared with Nakisa's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,231 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 543 · 67 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 642
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 71 in lease accounting
Segment leader
29%
FinQuery
- First choices
- 16 across its categories
- Named in
- 69 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 69 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Nakisa Lease Administration
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nakisa Lease Administration; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nakisa 9Nakisa Lease Accounting 2Nakisa Lease Accounting Suite 1
Follow Nakisa Lease Administration
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Nakisa is the company behind Nakisa Lease Administration.ShowHide
The company
Nakisa is the company behind Nakisa Lease Administration.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- poised to grow with you
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Nakisa Lease Administration's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nakisa.com/event_category/nakisa-lease-administration, nakisa.com/resources/count-on-growth-with-nakisa-lease-administration, nakisa.com/category/finance/nakisa-lease-administration. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nakisa Lease Administration's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nakisa Lease Administration, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nakisa Lease Administration by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Nakisa Lease Administration is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nakisa Lease Administration, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.