Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 63 → 58 of 59
1 category · RankedVisual Lease
107Judge labels
8First choices
23Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Lease accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 36 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Visual Lease →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business65 of 67
0%26 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market7 of 71
4%36 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 70
12%45 labels
accepted challenger
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Visual Lease for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 4% | 7 of 71 | 17% | 36 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Visual Lease held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Lease accounting · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 64
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 15% → 14%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 10% | 4% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 7 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Visual Lease across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Visual Lease across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels2
Paraphrase15 labels5
Comparative31 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labels1
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative107 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Excellent for cross-departmental collaboration between finance, real estate, legal, and IT teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“| Visual Lease | ERP integrations, mid-to-large portfolios |” MiniMax M2.5 · Lease accounting · scale prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Recommendation: Visual Lease” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you have complex real estate leases where you need to track rent bumps, facility maintenance, and renewal options, go with Visual Lease.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Visual Lease or LeaseQuery if you're on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · Lease accounting · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like LeaseQuery Advanced or Visual Lease” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lease accounting · budget prompt · hard negative
“Modification entries can post to accounting feeds without review prompts, meaning an incorrect entry can affect live financial data before it is caught.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good products, but they tend to be better fits when you already have a larger finance stack or more complex needs.” GPT-5.4 mini · Lease accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Visual Lease, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visual Lease was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Visual Lease, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visual Lease was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visual Lease. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 107 answers that named Visual Lease and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
softwareconnect.com67
debtbook.com62
finquery.com59
g2.com54
prophix.com51
capterra.com48
guideflow.com43
finantrix.com39
occupier.com39
trullion.com34
496 of the 496 domain citations in answers naming Visual Lease came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
visuallease.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Visual Lease takes 4% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
visuallease.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Visual Lease takes 4% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lease accounting tools”
8
Position for “lease accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“visual lease”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 16 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 40,765 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,858 · 555 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,180
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 18 clicks and $234 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 71 in lease accounting
Segment leader
29%
FinQuery
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 107 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 105 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on visuallease.com
628
subdomains included
Content
500
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 403 | 13 | 2026-09-02 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| News or press | 29 | 0 | 2021-08-30 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Case study | 23 | 0 | 2024-07-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 14 | 0 | 2025-06-27 | Lease accounting | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | 0 | 2024-02-14 | Lease accounting | |
| Comparison | 8 | 1 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2024-04-16 | Lease accounting | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2023-10-10 | Lease accounting | |
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2023-08-23 | Lease accounting | |
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-06-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-02Uniting lease accounting and lease administration blog
- 2026-09-02Understanding lease incentives why theyre important and accounting considerations under asc 842 blog
- 2026-09-02Navigating nonprofits asc 842 regulations what you need to know blog
- 2026-09-02Corporate real estate strategy a comprehensive approach blog
- 2026-08-31Lease audit procedures why do they matter blog
- 2026-08-31Gaap vs tax accounting financial reporting comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page visuallease.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Visual Lease
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Visual Lease; a claim can dispute any of them.
Visual Lease (CoStar Group) 1Visual Lease / CoStar Real Estate Manager 1
Follow Visual Lease
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Visual Lease is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Visual Lease is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Lease Accounting Management and Compliance Software
- For
- enterprise organizations
- Integrations claimed
- 6 visuallease.com/integrations
- Certifications
- ASC 842IFRS 16GASB 87GASB 96SSAE
- Customers named
- StarbucksWayfairPayPalQuanta Services Inc.Toll BrotherseBayMolson Coors Beverage Co.Chewy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Visual Lease's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: visuallease.com, visuallease.com/compliance, visuallease.com/products, visuallease.com/resources/case-studies, visuallease.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visual Lease's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visual Lease, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visual Lease by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Visual Lease is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Visual Lease, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.