Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 92 → 31 of 109
3 categories · RankedNomentia
27Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Treasury management syst for mid-market buyers
Rank 28 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Nomentia →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business32 of 117
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 124
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise82 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Nomentia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 28 of 124 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 49 of 101 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 44 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Nomentia held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 19 → 24 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 52 → 73 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account reconciliation | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 44 of 82 |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 28 of 124 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 49 of 101 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Nomentia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Nomentia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Nomentia focuses on modular treasury solutions, emphasizing bank connectivity, fraud prevention, and global payment hub capabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose a cloud-native, API-first TMS (like Kyriba, GTreasury/Ripple, or Nomentia)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · alternative
“Best Nordic/European Focus ... User-friendly, cloud-based, strong in mid-market” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: European-based companies or those seeking modular deployment” MiniMax M2.5 · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise TMS (e.g., Kyriba, SAP Treasury, GTreasury, Nomentia) ... often $100k-$500k+/year” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nomentia, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nomentia was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nomentia, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nomentia was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nomentia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Nomentia and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
debtbook.com16
eco.com16
nomentia.comYour site16
checkthat.ai12
gartner.com12
guideflow.com10
treasury.ripple.com10
g2.com9
kognitos.com9
agicap.com8
102 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Nomentia came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
nomentia.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Nomentia takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
nomentia.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Nomentia takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “treasury management system”
8
Position for “treasury management systems”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“nomentia”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,538 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 715 · 18 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,155
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 27 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on nomentia.com
1,006
subdomains included
Content
462
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
37 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 266 | 16 | 2026-09-24 | Cash flow forecasting, Treasury management syst | |
| News or press | 84 | 0 | 2025-12-17 | Treasury management syst, Cash flow forecasting | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 74 | 1 | 2026-07-16 | Cash flow forecasting | |
| Conference or event | 17 | 0 | 2021-12-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | Accounts receivable auto | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-03-30 | Treasury management syst | |
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2021-12-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2022-05-30 | Cash flow forecasting |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Why cash flow forecasting works better with a second point of view blog
- 2026-09-22Why treasury needs forecast accuracy and confidence blog
- 2026-09-22How ai generated reference forecasts improve cash flow planning blog
- 2026-09-15Why advanced analytics should start with the question blog
- 2026-09-15Advanced analytics for payments and treasury blog
- 2026-09-14Why cash visibility is no longer enough for modern treasury blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page nomentia.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Nomentia
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Nomentia is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Nomentia is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Nomentia provides a modern SaaS-based cash and treasury management system for the optimization of all treasury management processes.
- For
- treasury and finance teams
- Integrations claimed
- 10000 nomentia.com
- Certifications
- Information Security Management SystemInternational Standard on Assurance Engagements 3402SWIFT Customer Security ProgramFSQS-NL Supplier Qualification System
- Customers named
- AlexianerMakitaLufthansaSchott AGDeutsche Bank
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Nomentia's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nomentia.com, nomentia.com/security, nomentia.com/solutions/nomentia-bank-fee-analysis, nomentia.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nomentia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nomentia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nomentia by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Nomentia is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nomentia, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.