Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 54 → 40 of 107
1 category · RankedPathlock
18Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Internal controls for enterprise buyers
Rank 26 of 90 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business43 of 111
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market26 of 90
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise7 of 64
3%10 labels
accepted challenger
In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pathlock for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 26 of 90 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pathlock held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Internal controls · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 22 → 24 of 88
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 10 → 7 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 26 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pathlock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pathlock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ERP-heavy enterprises may require tools like Pathlock or SAP Audit Management” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“SAP Audit Management and Pathlock are tailored for SAP environments” Mistral Small · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for ERP-Heavy B2B (Segregation of Duties): Pathlock” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · direct prompt · alternative
“(e.g., Sprinto, Archer, Pathlock, or SAP Process Control)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pathlock, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pathlock was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pathlock, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pathlock was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pathlock. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named Pathlock and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
sprinto.com10
optro.ai9
gitnux.org7
riskwatch.com7
metricstream.com6
supervizor.com6
worldmetrics.org6
v-comply.com5
complianceofficer.ai4
highradius.com4
Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Pathlock came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pathlock.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Pathlock takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pathlock.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Pathlock takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “internal controls tools”
8
Position for “sox compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“pathlock”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 100,297 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,981 · 975 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,854
- Paid Google search
- 12 searches its ads show for, about 213 clicks and $8,432 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 90 in internal controls
Segment leader
25%
FloQast
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pathlock.com
2,176
subdomains included
Content
874
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
55 · 142
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 307 | 7 | 2026-09-25 | Internal controls, Procure-to-pay | |
| Glossary or explainer | 253 | 0 | 2025-09-09 | ERP systems | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 138 | 3 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| News or press | 70 | 8 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Report or ebook | 48 | 3 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 0 | 2024-10-17 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 11 | 3 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-12-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25A saviynt alternative for deeper erp controls comparison
- 2026-09-25Sap idm end of life blog
- 2026-09-15Cve 2026 44756 sap extended passport overflow unauthenticated memory corruption in the sap kernel blog
- 2026-09-10Sapinsider pathlock accenture dinner conference or event
- 2026-09-08Sap security patch day september 2026 blog
- 2026-09-08100826 sap security roundtable stockholm conference or event
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 22, 2026An Evening of Custom Blazers & Modern IGAIndochino, Miami, US · hosts
- November 18, 2026SAPinsider Dinner by Pathlock & AccentureSticks’n’Sushi (Located in: Tivoli Hotel, Copenhagen, Denmark), Copenhagen, Denmark · sponsors
Last twelve months
- June 10, 2026DSAG Annual CongressKoln, Germany · sponsored
As the event pages on pathlock.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pathlock.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Pathlock
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pathlock is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pathlock is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Compliance-Centric Identity Governance
- For
- Enterprises
- Integrations claimed
- 150 pathlock.com
- Customers named
- AramcoP&GJabilChevronToyotaSiemensMicrosoftElectrolux
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting
What Pathlock's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pathlock.com, pathlock.com/use-case/compliance, pathlock.com/use-cases, pathlock.com/case-studies, pathlock.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pathlock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pathlock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pathlock by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pathlock is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pathlock, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.