Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedReed & Mackay
1Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reed & Mackay was named 1 time in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market50 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Reed & Mackay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 50 of 61 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Navan at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Reed & Mackay held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 52 → 47 of 57
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 50 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Reed & Mackay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Reed & Mackay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“No customer service, unresponsive to requests, excessive booking fees, unjustified offline charges” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reed & Mackay, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reed & Mackay was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reed & Mackay, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reed & Mackay was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reed & Mackay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Reed & Mackay and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
au.trustpilot.com1
bbc.com1
business.booking.com1
ca.trustpilot.com1
cbtravel.com1
complaintsboard.com1
consumer.ftc.gov1
corporatetraveler.us1
corptraveller.com1
forecepts.com1
Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Reed & Mackay came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on reedmackay.com
2,762
subdomains included
Content
375
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 271 | 2 | 2026-07-16 | Corporate travel managem | |
| Case study | 60 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| News or press | 20 | 0 | 2021-01-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 15 | 0 | 2023-12-13 | ||
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-26 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-16Cyber security everything a travel manager needs to know blog
- 2026-07-016 ways to make a positive impact on your business travel destination blog
- 2026-06-16Customer success stories 5 case study
- 2026-06-16Customer success stories 5 case study
- 2026-06-16Customer success stories 5 case study
- 2026-05-19Duty of care in event travel blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reedmackay.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Reed & Mackay
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Reed & Mackay is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Reed & Mackay is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The global service leader for corporate travel and events.
- For
- businesses globally
- Free plan or trial
- Request a free demo reedmackay.com
- Certifications
- Ecovadis AwardCyber Essentials Plus Certificate LinkCyber Essentials Plus
- Customers named
- Audi
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Reed & Mackay's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: reedmackay.com, reedmackay.com/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reed & Mackay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reed & Mackay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reed & Mackay by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Reed & Mackay is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Reed & Mackay, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.