AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Salesforce · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Named, not ranked

Salesforce

13Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Salesforce was named 5 times in Financial close manageme and 3 other categories, where FloQast led with 55%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Salesforce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial close managementAccounting and close0%71 of 8550%2under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cash flow forecastingTreasury and cash0%94 of 101100%1under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Entity managementEquity and corporate0%66 of 81100%1under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%79 of 1050%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Salesforce held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 83 → 73 of 88
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 59 of 77
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 43 → 15 of 71

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Financial close manageme0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 20 → 71 of 85
Cash flow forecasting0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 94 of 101, unchanged
Entity management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 73 → 66 of 81
Financial reporting0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 112 → 79 of 105

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Salesforce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Tools that are built on top of generic platforms (like Salesforce or Zoho) without dedicated financial engineering” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Salesforce is not inherently the wrong CRM. It becomes the wrong choice when a company pays for enterprise flexibility... that its sales process does not require."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · soft negative
“build custom entity management trackers inside general-purpose platforms like Salesforce, SharePoint... Approach this option with caution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesforce, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesforce was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Pipedrive4 of 131Not among the top eight
Zoho CRM4 of 130Not among the top eight
HubSpot3 of 131Not among the top eight
HubSpot Sales Hub3 of 130Not among the top eight
BlackLine2 of 130Not among the top eight
Close2 of 130Not among the top eight
Freshsales2 of 130Not among the top eight
Microsoft Excel2 of 130Not among the top eight
Oracle NetSuite2 of 130Not among the top eight
Outreach2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesforce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 13 answers that named Salesforce and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4
worldmetrics.org4
gitnux.org3
guideflow.com3
pipelinecrm.com3
proposify.com3
blog.hubspot.com2
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2
clonepartner.com2
close.com2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Salesforce came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

salesforce.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Salesforce takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
550,000 a month (“salesforce”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
60,632 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,941,323 a month
Searches its site ranks for
242,877 · 49,522 in the top three
Sites linking to it
211,946
Paid Google search
14 searches its ads show for, about 363 clicks and $8,259 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
115+ ads · 114 text, 1 image · 115 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as Salesforce, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 79 in the year, 36 before. 5 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 71 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on salesforce.com
10,996
subdomains included
Content
710
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
270 · 37
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer25202025-06-17
Blog22542026-09-17
Case study98undated
Comparison4402026-04-23
News or press35202026-09-24
Report or ebook2912026-09-09
Template or tool1102026-03-09
Conference or event812026-09-08
Webinar or virtual event4undated
Podcast or video412026-09-17
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page salesforce.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Salesforce

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Salesforce is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The #1 Agentic AI CRM
For
companies of all sizes, from startups and small businesses to large global enterprises
Price stated
free salesforce.com
Starting price
0 salesforce.com
Free plan or trial
free for 30 days salesforce.com
Customers named
VolkswagenEngineGood360PrecinareMarkablePepsicoPandoraWilliams Sonoma
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Salesforce's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: salesforce.com, salesforce.com/pricing, trust.salesforce.com, salesforce.com/products, salesforce.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Salesforce is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Salesforce, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesforce.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.