Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 48 → 47 of 51
Workday · 3 categories · RankedWorkday Financial Management
116Judge labels
3First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in ERP systems for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Workday Financial Management →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business52 of 56
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 73
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 47
2%39 labels
accepted challenger
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday Financial Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 15 of 73 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 31 of 77 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 39 of 55 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday Financial Management held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ERP systems · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 10 → 15 of 63
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 of 41, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 15 of 73 |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 31 of 77 |
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 55, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday Financial Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday Financial Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase24 labels2
Comparative39 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labels1
Negative21 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative116 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Workday is the strongest ERP for services, professional and knowledge-worker-heavy organisations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ERP systems · comparative prompt · alternative
“Workday (best for service-centric enterprises needing integrated financials)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for managing enterprise finances: Workday.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ERP systems · comparative prompt · alternative
“Workday excels in HR/finance” Grok 4.1 Fast · ERP systems · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Check carefully that its operational, manufacturing, or distribution capabilities match your needs.” GPT-6 Luna · ERP systems · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Financial Management, over the 116 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Financial Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Financial Management, over the 116 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Financial Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Financial Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 110 of the 116 answers that named Workday Financial Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
erpresearch.com56
ramp.com25
techrepublic.com25
netsuite.com24
worldmetrics.org21
dualentry.com19
gitnux.org19
learn.g2.com15
sap.com15
erp-pilot.com14
233 of the 233 domain citations in answers naming Workday Financial Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Workday Financial Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Workday Financial Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“workday financial management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 73 in ERP systems
Segment leader
39%
Oracle NetSuite
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 116 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 110 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Workday Financial Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Financial Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday 11Workday (Financial Management) 1
Follow Workday Financial Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Financial Management.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Financial Management.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Workday
- Workday Accounting Agent, Workday Adaptive, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Financials, Workday P2P, Workday P2P/T&E, Workday PSA, Workday Performance and 8 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- FINANZSOFTWARE FÜR MITTELSTÄNDISCHE UNTERNEHMEN
- For
- mittelständische Unternehmen
- Free plan or trial
- Demo bekijken (2:07) workday.com/nl-nl/midsize-business/financial-management-software.html
- Customers named
- Ascendex UnderwritersUnumCushman & WakefieldTripadvisor
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workday Financial Management's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/de-de/smb/financial-management-software.html, workday.com/en-au/sme/financial-management-software.html, workday.com/nl-nl/pages/erp-workday-enterprise-management-cloud.html, workday.com/nl-nl/midsize-business/financial-management-software.html, workday.com/en-us/products/workday-financial-management-agent-led-demo.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Financial Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Financial Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Financial Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday Financial Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Financial Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.