Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
SharePoint
27Judge labels
0First choices
23Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SharePoint was named 8 times in Board and 4 other categories, where OnBoard led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market94 of 99
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise100 of 100
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In board · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SharePoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 94 of 99 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 78 of 81 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Board portals | Equity and corporate | 0% | 42 of 50 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 49% | |
| Transfer pricing | Tax and compliance | 0% | 76 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30% | |
| Virtual data rooms | Equity and corporate | 0% | 45 of 48 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by iDeals at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SharePoint held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Board · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 80 → 90 of 95
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 97 → 95 of 95
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 94 of 99 |
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 78 of 81 |
| Board portals | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 50, unchanged |
| Transfer pricing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 101, unchanged |
| Virtual data rooms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 48, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SharePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SharePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative20 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“like Teams, SharePoint, or Dropbox: useful for sharing files, but not built for board governance, role-based access, or audit trails” Perplexity Sonar · Board · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like Google Drive, Dropbox, SharePoint, or OneDrive used for high‑stakes transactions. - Why risky: No granular permissions” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Virtual data rooms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Email + SharePoint/Google Drive)... introduce significant risks when used as primary board reporting channels.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid using generic tools (like SharePoint or Excel) for entity management” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SharePoint, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SharePoint was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SharePoint, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SharePoint was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SharePoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 27 answers that named SharePoint and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
fast.io14
boardintelligence.com12
appdeck.com11
g2.com10
zipdo.co10
worldmetrics.org9
onboardmeetings.com8
diligent.com7
guideflow.com7
imboard.ai7
No domain is on file for SharePoint, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SharePoint stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SharePoint stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 673,000 a month (“sharepoint”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 20,386 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 94 of 99 in board
Segment leader
26%
OnBoard
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 27 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SharePoint
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SharePoint; a claim can dispute any of them.
SharePoint/Google Drive 1
Follow SharePoint
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SharePoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SharePoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SharePoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SharePoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SharePoint, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.