Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 107 → 76 of 111
1 category · Named, not rankedSourceDay
4Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SourceDay was named 3 times in Supplier management, where Precoro led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business80 of 117
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market84 of 111
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SourceDay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 84 of 111 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SourceDay held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Supplier management · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 81 of 107, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SourceDay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SourceDay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Direct spend focus; PO mgmt, supplier collaboration, invoicing automation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your pain point is late deliveries and PO chaos → SourceDay.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid for limited budgets: enterprise platforms like SourceDay” GPT-5.4 mini · Supplier management · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SourceDay, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SourceDay was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SourceDay, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SourceDay was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SourceDay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named SourceDay and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com3
caddi.com2
erpresearch.com2
gitnux.org2
learn.g2.com2
striven.com2
suppliergateway.com2
vocus.cc2
accio.com1
apsentra.com1
Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming SourceDay came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sourceday.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SourceDay takes 0% of first choices and Precoro takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sourceday.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SourceDay takes 0% of first choices and Precoro takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “supplier management software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “supplier management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 84 of 111 in supplier management
Segment leader
14%
Precoro
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sourceday.com
420
subdomains included
Content
208
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
4 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 160 | 12 | 2026-08-17 | ERP systems, Procure-to-pay | |
| Case study | 32 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2023-01-04 | ||
| News or press | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-10 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-17Case study case study
- 2026-08-17Data as a service blog
- 2026-08-10Procurement automation workflows buyer productivity blog
- 2026-08-06Ebook report or ebook
- 2026-08-06Research blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sourceday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SourceDay
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SourceDay is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SourceDay is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-driven supplier portal
- For
- buyers, suppliers, and ERP
- Integrations claimed
- 500 sourceday.com
- Customers named
- Midland PlasticsThe Morey CorporationStrong Yun IndustrialBraunAbilityAg LeaderSportsman BoatsChatsworth ProductsJBT AeroTech
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting
What SourceDay's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sourceday.com, sourceday.com/platform, sourceday.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SourceDay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SourceDay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SourceDay by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SourceDay is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SourceDay, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.