Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Tookitaki · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Tookitaki

9Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tookitaki was named 4 times in AML monitoring, where ComplyAdvantage led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business50 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market28 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprise10 of 108

under the label threshold

In aml monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tookitaki for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AML and transaction monitoring	Tax and compliance	0%	28 of 108	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tookitaki yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tookitaki across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For best all-around AML suite: ComplyAdvantage, Tookitaki, or Ondato.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · first choice

“Broader AML suite with monitoring and case workflow | Tookitaki | Covers transaction monitoring, case management, sanctions screening, and reporting.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Offers a consolidated environment for transaction monitoring, case management, SAR/STR workflow” Llama 4 Maverick · AML monitoring · direct prompt · alternative

“increasingly favor AI-native platforms like Feedzai or Tookitaki for lower false-positive rates” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tookitaki, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tookitaki was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

NICE Actimize4 of 93Not among the top eight

ComplyAdvantage4 of 91Not among the top eight

Ondato3 of 91Not among the top eight

LexisNexis Risk Solutions3 of 90Not among the top eight

Alessa2 of 90Not among the top eight

Fraud.net2 of 90Not among the top eight

FraudNet2 of 90Not among the top eight

SAS Anti-Money Laundering2 of 90Not among the top eight

SEON2 of 90Not among the top eight

ThetaRay2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tookitaki. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Tookitaki and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tookitaki.comYour site9

fraud.net7

guideflow.com7

shuftipro.com7

ondato.com6

learn.g2.com5

capterra.com4

seon.io4

bureau.id3

complyadvantage.com3

Forty-six of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Tookitaki came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

tookitaki.com/compliance-hub/best-aml-platforms9

guideflow.com/blog/aml-software7

ondato.com/blog/best-aml-software6

learn.g2.com/best-anti-money-laundering-software5

capterra.com/aml-software4

fraud.net/resources/top-aml-software4

shuftipro.com/blog/best-transaction-monitoring-software4

bureau.id/resources/blog/transaction-monitoring-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

tookitaki.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Tookitaki takes 0% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 28 of 108 in AML monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ComplyAdvantage

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 9 answers
Its own site cited: in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on tookitaki.com

1,351

subdomains included

Content

538

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	250	undated	Account reconciliation
Glossary or explainer	197	undated
Report or ebook	45	undated
Conference or event	31	undated
Case study	6	undated
Comparison	5	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Template or tool	1	undated
Podcast or video	1	undated
News or press	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page tookitaki.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Tookitaki

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tookitaki; a claim can dispute any of them.

Tookitaki (FinCense) 1

Follow Tookitaki

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Tookitaki is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The intelligence ecosystem for APAC financial institutions.
tookitaki.com
For: APAC financial institutions
tookitaki.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Certified
Customers named: MayaCompliance Office of a Singapore BankDigital Bank ClientPayment Services ClientE-Wallet Client
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Tookitaki's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: tookitaki.com, tookitaki.com/security, tookitaki.com/products/anti-money-laundering-suite. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tookitaki's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tookitaki, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tookitaki by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Tookitaki is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tookitaki, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.