Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 18% → 21%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 of 88, unchanged
10 categories · RankedFloQast
387Judge labels
91First choices
85Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
10Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
55% in Financial close manageme for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 85 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
12 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 57 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of FloQast →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 92
19%51 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 85
55%57 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise2 of 75
12%59 labels
criticized challenger
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named FloQast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 55% | 1 of 85 | 19% | 57 | endorsed leader | ▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 33% | 1 of 82 | 9% | 43 | endorsed leader | ▼−2Since September 2026: 33% → 30%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 25% | 1 of 90 | 4% | 28 | accepted challenger | ▲+9Since September 2026: 18% → 27%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 2% | 12 of 85 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 31 of 102 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 0% | 32 of 55 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 65 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 57 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 64 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SEC and disclosure reporting | Accounting and close | 0% | 60 of 63 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32% |
Movement
Since September 2026, FloQast held within the floor in all ten categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
53%from 60% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 of 77, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 18% | 27% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 18% → 27%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 90 |
| Financial close manageme | 60% | 53% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 85, unchanged |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 3% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 12 of 85 |
| Account reconciliation | 33% | 30% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 33% → 30%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 82, unchanged |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 31 of 102 |
| Accounting software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 55, unchanged |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 72 → 65 of 101 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 99, unchanged |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 71 → 64 of 105 |
| Disclosure reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 63, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated FloQast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated FloQast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 14 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 7 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 13 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct90 labels39
Paraphrase68 labels27
Comparative73 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained52 labels9
Scale-constrained57 labels16
Negative47 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative387 labels in all, every segment counted; 91 of the 110 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, FloQast represents the best balance of implementation speed, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendly design.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial close manageme · direct prompt · first choice
“Excellent for collaboration, close-management, and balance sheet substantiation. It integrates deeply with Excel, making adoption incredibly easy” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Account reconciliation · scale prompt · first choice
“Most mid-market B2B companies find that FloQast or Trintech Adra provide the best balance of features, ease of use, and value for money.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with FloQast if your SOX controls are embedded in your monthly financial close process and you want the fastest time-to-value” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid Enterprise Tools: BlackLine/FloQast/Workiva are powerful ... overkill for limited budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused tools like BlackLine, FloQast, and Trintech if budget is a concern” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget - FloQast \u2014 from about $30,000/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · budget prompt · hard negative
“Some of the tools mentioned include FloQast, BlackLine, and AutoRek, which can be effective but may require additional time to address discrepancies.” Llama 4 Maverick · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FloQast, over the 387 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FloQast was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FloQast, over the 387 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FloQast was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FloQast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 377 of the 387 answers that named FloQast and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
numeric.io214
bluecopa.com148
guideflow.com118
maxima.ai112
prophix.com112
highradius.com111
g2.com110
learn.g2.com106
worldmetrics.org77
ramp.com73
1,181 of the 1,181 domain citations in answers naming FloQast came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where FloQast stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where FloQast stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“floqast”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 194 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 41,324 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,643 · 341 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,906
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 217 clicks and $5,039 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
55%
rank 1 of 85 in financial close manageme
First choices
91
across its categories
- Named in
- 387 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 377 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on floqast.com
4,378
subdomains included
Content
2,544
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
101 · 75
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,326 | undated | |||
| News or press | 617 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 281 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 84 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 78 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 62 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 42 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 36 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Case study | 6 | undated |
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 20, 2026TakeControl London 2026Shangri-La The Shard, London · hosts
- November 5, 2026CFGI and FloQast Take On The GardenMadison Square Garden, New York, US · hosts
Last twelve months
- November 13, 2025A Night with FloQast & EYGrey Gardens, Toronto, Canada · hosted
As the event pages on floqast.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page floqast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as FloQast
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FloQast; a claim can dispute any of them.
FloQast (with FloQast Compliance) 1
Follow FloQast
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
FloQast is its own company.ShowHide
The company
FloQast is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Accounting Workflow Automation
- For
- enterprise accounting teams
- Price stated
- No Per-User Fees. Pricing Built Around Value, Not Headcount. floqast.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 42001 certifiedSOC 2 Type II compliantISO 42001SOC 3
- Customers named
- HuelHubSpotSoundCloud
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What FloQast's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: floqast.com, floqast.com/pricing, trust.floqast.com, floqast.com/solutions/erps/aws, floqast.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FloQast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FloQast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FloQast by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where FloQast is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name FloQast, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where FloQast is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where FloQast is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideFinancial close management
AI models recommend FloQast first in Financial close management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Account reconciliation
AI models recommend FloQast first in Account reconciliation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Internal controls and SOX
AI models recommend FloQast first in Internal controls and SOX this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.