Index › Products › Zero Hash · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Zero Hash

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zero Hash was named 3 times in Stablecoin platforms, where BVNK led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business91 of 119

under the label threshold

Mid-market36 of 141

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 111

under the label threshold

In stablecoin platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zero Hash for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Stablecoin platforms	Treasury and cash	0%	36 of 141	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zero Hash yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zero Hash across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“More developer-heavy; better for platforms building their own wallet interfaces” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zero Hash, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zero Hash was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BVNK10 of 103Not among the top eight

Circle8 of 104Not among the top eight

Fireblocks6 of 101Not among the top eight

Bridge5 of 102Not among the top eight

Paxos5 of 100Not among the top eight

Stripe Crypto5 of 100Not among the top eight

Cobo3 of 100Not among the top eight

Coinbase Business3 of 100Not among the top eight

Ripple3 of 100Not among the top eight

BitPay2 of 100Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zero Hash. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Zero Hash and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eco.com7

fireblocks.com6

osl.com6

bvnk.com5

cobo.com5

circle.com4

coingape.com4

fuze.finance4

stablecoininsider.org4

alchemy.com3

No domain is on file for Zero Hash, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

osl.com/en/bits/article/best-enterprise-stablecoin-payment-platforms-comparison-review5

fuze.finance/blog/best-stablecoin-infrastructure-platforms4

alchemy.com/overviews/enterprise-stablecoin-guide3

bvnk.com/blog/enterprise-stablecoin-payment-solutions3

cobo.com/post/2026-guide-to-the-most-reliable-stablecoin-payments-providers3

coingape.com/best-stablecoin-infrastructure-provider-companies3

eco.com/support/en/articles/14797799-stablecoin-payment-processors-compared-20263

opendue.com/blog/best-stablecoin-payment-providers3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Zero Hash stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 5,400 a month (“zero hash”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 142 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 36 of 141 in stablecoin platforms

Segment leader

23%

BVNK

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 10 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Zero Hash

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zero Hash's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zero Hash, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zero Hash by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Zero Hash is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zero Hash, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.