Lease accounting · October 2026 Edition
iLeasePro vs Visual Lease
Three of fourteen models named iLeasePro first on the direct prompt; zero named Visual Lease. iLeasePro was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Visual Lease by thirteen and iLeasePro carries 20 labels and Visual Lease 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share10%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2036A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, iLeasePro reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.FinQuery was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. FinQuery vs iLeasePro · FinQuery vs Visual Lease · EZLease vs iLeasePro
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lease accounting page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
iLeaseProFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVisual Lease
Direct30
Paraphrase11
Comparative01
Budget-constrained104 against Visual Lease
Scale-constrained01
Negative002 against Visual Lease
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where iLeasePro and Visual Lease stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
iLeasePro Visual Lease first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, iLeasePro on the left and Visual Lease on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where iLeasePro and Visual Lease stood in it.
iLeasePro first, Visual Lease not the choice
3 of 14 modelsVisual Lease was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmalliLeasePro alternatives: FinQuery, Prophix One Lease Accounting, Spacebase
Qwen 3.7 FlashiLeasePro alternatives: FinQuery, LeaseWave, Trullion
MiniMax M2.5FinQuery, iLeasePro alternatives: LeaseCalcs, Occupier, Spacebase
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashFinQuery alternatives: Crunchafi, NetLease, SOFT4Lessee, Trullion, Visual Lease
Perplexity SonarFinQuery alternatives: Trullion, Visual Lease, iLeasePro
Grok 4.1 FastFinQuery alternatives: LeaseCrunch, Visual Lease
DeepSeek V4 FlashLeaseCrunch alternatives: EZLease, FinQuery, Sage Intacct, Visual Lease
Llama 4 MaverickLeasecake alternatives: FinQuery, Visual Lease, iLeasePro
Kimi K2FinQuery alternatives: EZLease, Occupier, Sage Intacct, iLeasePro
GLM 4.7 FlashXFinQuery alternatives: Lease Insight, LeaseAccelerator, MRI ProLease, iLeasePro
GPT-6 LunaFinQuery's LeaseQuery alternatives: Occupier, Visual Lease
Muse Glimmer 30BFinQuery, formerly LeaseQuery alternatives: MRI ProLease, SOFT4Lessee, Visual Lease, iLeasePro
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5SOFT4Lessee alternatives: EZLease, FinQuery, Spacebase
GPT-5.4 miniFinQuery alternatives: EZLease, Nakisa Lease Administration
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
iLeasePro leads by fifteen points.
iLeasePro15%#3 of 10Visual Lease0%#10 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
iLeasePro leads by six points.
iLeasePro10%#3 of 13Visual Lease4%#5 of 13Enterprise
The order flips: Visual Lease leads at enterprise.
Visual Lease12%#3 of 10iLeasePro0%#– of 10What the models said about iLeasePro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“A cloud-based solution specifically designed for mid-market companies... frequently recommended for its comprehensive lease lifecycle management” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“The best lease accounting software for a company with a limited budget is iLeasePro, which is great for small lessees.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with FinQuery or iLeasePro as they specifically target mid-market companies” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Visual Lease
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Visual Lease or LeaseQuery if you're on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like LeaseQuery Advanced or Visual Lease” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Modification entries can post to accounting feeds without review prompts, meaning an incorrect entry can affect live financial data before it is caught.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent for cross-departmental collaboration between finance, real estate, legal, and IT teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“| Visual Lease | ERP integrations, mid-to-large portfolios |” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Recommendation: Visual Lease” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
FinQuery vs iLeaseProFinQuery vs Visual LeaseEZLease vs iLeaseProEZLease vs Visual LeaseiLeasePro vs LeaseGuruiLeasePro vs CrunchafiiLeasePro vs LeaseCrunchiLeasePro vs TrullionLeaseGuru vs Visual LeaseVisual Lease vs CrunchafiVisual Lease vs LeaseCrunchVisual Lease vs TrullionAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full lease accounting standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.