Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 19% → 15%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 59
1 category · RankediLeasePro
44Judge labels
13First choices
1Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Lease accounting for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of iLeasePro →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business3 of 67
15%22 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 71
10%20 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise56 of 70
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named iLeasePro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 10% | 3 of 71 | 0% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, iLeasePro held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Lease accounting · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 64
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 37 → 52 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 12% | 11% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated iLeasePro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated iLeasePro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels6
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative6 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels5
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A cloud-based solution specifically designed for mid-market companies... frequently recommended for its comprehensive lease lifecycle management” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“The best lease accounting software for a company with a limited budget is iLeasePro, which is great for small lessees.” Llama 4 Maverick · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with FinQuery or iLeasePro as they specifically target mid-market companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“Trullion and iLeasePro are the most popular and user-friendly options” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iLeasePro, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iLeasePro was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iLeasePro, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iLeasePro was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iLeasePro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 44 answers that named iLeasePro and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
softwareconnect.com39
getapp.com32
debtbook.com31
finquery.com22
capterra.com20
acquisition-international.com19
g2.com19
prophix.com16
guideflow.com13
selecthub.com13
224 of the 224 domain citations in answers naming iLeasePro came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ileasepro.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iLeasePro takes 10% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ileasepro.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iLeasePro takes 10% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lease accounting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “lease accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“ileasepro”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 439 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 508 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 504
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 3 of 71 in lease accounting
Segment leader
29%
FinQuery
- First choices
- 13 across its categories
- Named in
- 44 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 44 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ileasepro.com
407
subdomains included
Content
361
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 329 | 21 | 2026-09-28 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Comparison | 20 | 15 | 2026-09-28 | Lease accounting | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-01-21 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-12-29 | ||
| News or press | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-16 | Lease accounting | |
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2024-12-10 | Lease accounting |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ileasepro 2026 soc 1 type 2 report blog
- 2026-09-28Combining lease contracts under asc 842 blog
- 2026-09-28Direct financing lease accounting blog
- 2026-09-28Lease inception vs commencement date comparison
- 2026-09-28Sale leaseback gain recognition under asc 842 blog
- 2026-09-28Triple net lease blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ileasepro.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as iLeasePro
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iLeasePro; a claim can dispute any of them.
iLeasePro / iLeaseXpress 1iLeaseXpress / iLeasePro 1
Follow iLeasePro
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
iLeasePro is its own company.ShowHide
The company
iLeasePro is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Lease Intelligence Platform for ASC 842 compliance and lease portfolio management. Automated journal entries, comprehensive reporting, and strategic lease insights.
- For
- Built for private US companies with 25 to 500 leases.
- Price stated
- Pricing published, so you can size it before you call us. Plans start free. Every tier, what it includes and what it costs are on the pricing page, with a calculator that takes your lease count and tells you the number. ileasepro.com
- Starting price
- 0 ileasepro.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Plans start free. ileasepro.com
- Certifications
- SOC 1 Type 2 certifiedASC 842-compliant
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What iLeasePro's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ileasepro.com, ileasepro.com/pricing, ileasepro.com/blog/compliance, ileasepro.com/features, ileasepro.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iLeasePro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iLeasePro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iLeasePro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where iLeasePro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name iLeasePro, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where iLeasePro is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where iLeasePro is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideiLeasePro is among the products AI models recommend first in Lease accounting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.