Qapita vs Fidelity Private Shares
Three of fourteen models named Qapita first on the direct prompt; zero named Fidelity Private Shares. Qapita was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Fidelity Private Shares by eight and Qapita carries 29 labels and Fidelity Private Shares 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cap table management page.
By framing
QapitaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFidelity Private Shares
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Qapita and Fidelity Private Shares were named in the same answer nine times, of the 70 answers naming Qapita and the 25 naming Fidelity Private Shares. In those answers Fidelity Private Shares took the first choice zero times and Qapita zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Qapita Fidelity Private Shares first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Qapita on the left and Fidelity Private Shares on the right.The direct prompt
Qapita first, Fidelity Private Shares not the choice
3 of 14 modelsFidelity Private Shares was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Qapita4%#5 of 10Fidelity Private Shares0%#8 of 10Qapita12%#3 of 10Fidelity Private Shares2%#8 of 10Qapita9%#4 of 11Fidelity Private Shares0%#– of 11What the models said about Qapita
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“recurring mentions of technical issues, limited customization, and complex reporting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Qapita is a top recommendation due to its strong mid-market focus, ease of use, and comprehensive features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Qapita stands out as the best overall choice due to its scalability, automation, and global capabilities.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Qapita — Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Go with Qapita or Cake Equity” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Fidelity Private Shares
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Choose Fidelity Private Shares if you are a brand new company, want institutional-grade legal compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Highly rated, stable alternatives in the current market include Fidelity Private Shares (historically Shoobx)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“leaders like Ledgy or Fidelity Private Shares ... Fidelity Private Shares (<25 stakeholders)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.