Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 of 47, unchanged
1 category · RankedQapita
70Judge labels
13First choices
8Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Cap table management for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 42 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Qapita →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 53
4%15 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 42
12%29 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 52
9%26 labels
accepted challenger
In cap table management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Qapita for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap table management | Equity and corporate | 12% | 3 of 42 | 3% | 29 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 14% → 14%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Qapita held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cap table management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 14% → 14%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 39
Enterprise▼−1Since September 2026: 9% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 48
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap table management | 14% | 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 14% → 14%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Qapita across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Qapita across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels4
Paraphrase10 labels4
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels4
Scale-constrained11 labels1
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Qapita is a top recommendation due to its strong mid-market focus, ease of use, and comprehensive features” Mistral Small · Cap table management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Qapita stands out as the best overall choice due to its scalability, automation, and global capabilities.” Mistral Small · Cap table management · direct prompt · first choice
“Qapita — Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Go with Qapita or Cake Equity” MiniMax M2.5 · Cap table management · direct prompt · first choice
“Qapita appears to be the strongest choice for mid-market companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cap table management · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“recurring mentions of technical issues, limited customization, and complex reporting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cap table management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qapita, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qapita was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qapita, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qapita was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qapita. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 70 of the 70 answers that named Qapita and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qapita.comYour site61
guideflow.com46
cakeequity.com34
valueaddvc.com33
waveup.com28
resources.rework.com26
ctacquisitions.com21
thecfoclub.com21
eqvista.com19
sliceglobal.com18
246 of the 307 domain citations in answers naming Qapita came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
qapita.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Qapita takes 12% of first choices and Carta takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
qapita.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Qapita takes 12% of first choices and Carta takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cap table platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cap table management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“qapita”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 17,649 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,612 · 59 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 841
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $122 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
12%
rank 3 of 42 in cap table management
Segment leader
33%
Carta
- First choices
- 13 across its categories
- Named in
- 70 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 70 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on qapita.com
1,842
subdomains included
Content
1,386
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
111 · 30
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 905 | 13 | 2026-09-25 | Cap table management | |
| Podcast or video | 90 | undated | |||
| News or press | 82 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 79 | 14 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 78 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 74 | 0 | 2024-03-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 46 | 3 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Case study | 28 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Transfer agent blog
- 2026-09-25What is carried interest and how does it work glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24What is portfolio monitoring complete guide glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-23Alternate investment funds blog
- 2026-09-22Employee stock purchase plans blog
- 2026-09-22Startup due diligence blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page qapita.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Qapita
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qapita; a claim can dispute any of them.
Qapita (Spark Tier) 1
Follow Qapita
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Qapita is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Qapita is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a global equity management platform
- For
- Companies & Funds; founders, HR, finance, investors, law firms, fractional CFOs, accelerators and VCs
- Price stated
- Transparent Pricing qapita.com
- Starting price
- Free qapita.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free qapita.com/pricing
- Customers named
- DocquityABBPE Capital ManagementManifest Global Pte. Ltd.MailmodoBoatZingbusZetwerkMyFave
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Qapita's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: qapita.com, qapita.com/pricing, trust.qapita.com, qapita.com/solutions/hr. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qapita's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qapita, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qapita by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Qapita is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qapita, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Qapita is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Qapita is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideQapita is among the products AI models recommend first in Cap table management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.