Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 41 → 23 of 79
6 categories · RankedAbacum
75Judge labels
9First choices
6Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in FP&A platforms for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 74 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Abacum →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 80
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 74
7%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise32 of 57
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In fp&a platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Abacum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 7% | 5 of 74 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 4% | 8 of 105 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 3% | 10 of 77 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 26 of 101 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 25 of 99 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 71 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Abacum held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · FP&A platforms · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 14 → 6 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 17 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 8 of 105 |
| FP&A platforms | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 5 of 74 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 26 of 101 |
| Financial modeling | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 10 of 77 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 25 of 99 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Abacum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Abacum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels4
Paraphrase11 labels5
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Abacum – Recommended for mid-market and larger companies with a dedicated finance team, offering robust modeling and AI-driven features.” Mistral Small · Financial modeling · direct prompt · first choice
“Drivetrain and Abacum stand out for their advanced features, scalability, and ease of implementation” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend Abacum as the best default choice for a finance dashboard / FP&A tool.” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Abacum as the top scenario planning tool for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial modeling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“stronger planning tools, but usually more expensive than a small company budget allows” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial modeling · budget prompt · soft negative
“older versions of Mosaic/Abacum... These replace spreadsheets entirely” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Abacum, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Abacum was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Abacum, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Abacum was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Abacum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 73 of the 75 answers that named Abacum and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
drivetrain.ai43
abacum.aiYour site35
learn.g2.com28
guideflow.com27
cubesoftware.com25
datarails.com25
resources.rework.com24
getaleph.com23
prophix.com20
centage.com19
234 of the 269 domain citations in answers naming Abacum came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
abacum.ai ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Abacum takes 7% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
abacum.ai ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Abacum takes 7% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “fp&a software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “fp&a platforms”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“abacum”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 18 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 79,014 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,238 · 489 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,178
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $26 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 5 of 74 in FP&A platforms
Segment leader
20%
Planful
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 75 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 73 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on abacum.ai
950
subdomains included
Content
666
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
13 · 76
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 325 | 28 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 140 | 78 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 51 | 29 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| News or press | 48 | 26 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 20 | 18 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 20 | 17 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 18 | 7 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | 7 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 5 | 2026-09-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Vs pigment comparison
- 2026-09-29Vs adaptive comparison
- 2026-09-29Vs planful comparison
- 2026-09-29Vs drivetrain comparison
- 2026-09-29Roi calculator template or tool
- 2026-09-29Suiteworld 2026 conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page abacum.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Abacum
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Abacum; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mosaic/Abacum 1
Follow Abacum
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Abacum is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Abacum is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI-native FP&A platform
- For
- CFOs
- Price stated
- Custom pricing — demo available abacum.ai
- Starting price
- 0 abacum.ai/product/data
- Free plan or trial
- demo available abacum.ai/product/data
- Integrations claimed
- 700 abacum.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II certifiedISO 27001 certifiedGDPR compliant
- Customers named
- RapidSOSPostHogTunnlHighwayUpvestCoffman EngineersStravaSoftonic
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Abacum's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: abacum.ai, trust.abacum.ai, abacum.ai/product/data, abacum.ai/customers, abacum.ai/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Abacum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Abacum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Abacum by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Abacum is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Abacum, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.