| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 6% | 6 of 77 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 6% | 6 of 74 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 3% | 7 of 99 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 2% | 14 of 101 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 2% | 16 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 6 of 74 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 7 of 99 |
| Financial modeling | 4% | 7% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 6 of 77 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 70 → 16 of 105 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 14 of 101 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Drivetrain if you are a fast-growing B2B/SaaS company looking for quick time-to-value, strong AI features, and deep SaaS metric modeling.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial modeling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Drivetrain and Abacum stand out for their advanced features, scalability, and ease of implementation” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Drivetrain – Built specifically for B2B strategic finance, targeting mid-market companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial modeling · direct prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one, I'd recommend Drivetrain for a mid-sized B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 103 of the 103 answers that named Drivetrain and are not a share of its labels.
255 of the 345 domain citations in answers naming Drivetrain came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
First shown December 2025, as Drivetrain AI Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 173 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 50 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 18 | undated | |||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page drivetrain.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Drivetrain's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: drivetrain.ai, trust.drivetrain.ai, drivetrain.ai/use-cases/budgeting, drivetrain.ai/customers, drivetrain.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Drivetrain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Drivetrain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Drivetrain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: