Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 101
6 categories · RankedJirav
156Judge labels
16First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Financial modeling for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Jirav →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 116
6%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market11 of 99
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Jirav for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 2% | 11 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 2% | 14 of 77 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 20 of 74 | 20% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 28 of 101 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 26 of 99 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 69 of 105 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Jirav held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 26 → 35 of 91
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 20 of 74 |
| Financial modeling | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 14 of 77 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 11 of 99 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 28 of 101 |
| Board | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 26 of 99 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 69 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Jirav across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Jirav across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct37 labels7
Paraphrase22 labels5
Comparative27 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labels3
Scale-constrained23 labels1
Negative21 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative156 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd shortlist Jirav first. It covers core FP&A needs” GPT-6 Luna · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · first choice
“SaaS/B2B metrics heavy: Jirav or Drivetrain.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial modeling · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for growing companies and accounting advisory firms that need structured, out-of-the-box financial models.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Jirav provides out-of-the-box templates for driver-based budgeting, cash flows, and SaaS/business metrics.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be cautious of: Mid-market tools like Jirav or basic tiers of Cube... aren’t architected for complex consolidation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
“Instead of paying thousands of dollars a year for heavy-duty enterprise FP&A ... platforms like Jirav or Cube” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · budget prompt · soft negative
“Users report UI inconsistencies and difficulty understanding user permission levels.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need advanced dimensionality or complex multi-entity modeling” Kimi K2 · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jirav, over the 156 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jirav was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jirav, over the 156 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jirav was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jirav. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 151 of the 156 answers that named Jirav and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
drivetrain.ai80
cubesoftware.com78
g2.com62
datarails.com56
clockwork.ai53
learn.g2.com39
getaleph.com38
golimelight.com38
resources.rework.com35
centage.com34
513 of the 513 domain citations in answers naming Jirav came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jirav.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jirav takes 2% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
jirav.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jirav takes 2% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “epm software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “epm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“jirav”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 15 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,780 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,633 · 34 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,276
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
- First choices
- 16 across its categories
- Named in
- 156 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 151 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jirav.com
575
subdomains included
Content
275
counted in the table below
Documentation
199
Product · Integration
6 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 198 | 7 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Case study | 29 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 12 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 12 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Budget vs forecast whats the difference and why both matter comparison
- 2026-09-08What is fpa a complete guide to financial planning and analysis glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-04Financial modeling for startups from seed to series b blog
- 2026-08-27Cash flow kpis the metrics every cfo and advisor should monitor blog
- 2026-08-03Excel vs fpa software when its time to make the switch comparison
- 2026-07-14Jirav xero advanced forecasting for xero connected firms blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jirav.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Jirav
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Jirav is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Jirav is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- FP&A and Financial Forecasting Software; the financial planning and analysis solution for accounting firms and SMB's. An 'all-in-one' software for forecasting, budgeting and modeling.
- For
- Accounting Firms & Businesses; accounting firms and SMB's; accounting and CFO firms; small or medium business; small and midsize companies; modern accounting firms; VC-funded companies
- Price stated
- $100/month-$750/month jirav.com
- Starting price
- 100 jirav.com
- Customers named
- AcuityClosedLoop.aiCompass EastCreative PlanningEide BaillyForvisGrowthLabarkona
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Jirav's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jirav.com, jirav.com/pricing, jirav.com/product/overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jirav's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jirav, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jirav by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Jirav is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jirav, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.