Every category where a model named Accruent Lucernex for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	24 of 71	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 29%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Accruent Lucernex held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Lease accounting · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 23 of 59

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 of 64, unchanged

Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 14 → 7 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Lease accounting	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 23 → 24 of 71

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Accruent Lucernex across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Large real estate portfolios | Strong multi-currency/multi-lingual support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · scale prompt · alternative

“best for enterprise real estate portfolios” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Accruent Lucernex, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Accruent Lucernex was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FinQuery15 of 164Not among the top eight

Nakisa Lease Administration10 of 163Not among the top eight

Visual Lease9 of 161Not among the top eight

Trullion7 of 160Not among the top eight

LeaseAccelerator5 of 161Not among the top eight

MRI ProLease5 of 160Not among the top eight

NetLease4 of 160Not among the top eight

Black Owl Systems3 of 161Not among the top eight

EZLease3 of 161Not among the top eight

Yardi Corom3 of 160Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Accruent Lucernex. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Accruent Lucernex and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

accruent.comYour site10

finquery.com10

finantrix.com9

guideflow.com9

softwareconnect.com9

capterra.com8

debtbook.com8

g2.com8

nakisa.com7

netgain.tech7

Seventy-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Accruent Lucernex came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

accruent.com/solutions/lease-accounting-software9

finantrix.com/buyer-guides/lease-accounting-administration-software9

finquery.com/lease-accounting-software9

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software8

guideflow.com/blog/lease-accounting-software7

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software7

capterra.com/lease-accounting-software6

g2.com/categories/lease-accounting6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

accruent.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Accruent Lucernex takes 0% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “lease accounting tools”

Position for “lease accounting software”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“accruent lucernex”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its company's site: accruent.com shared with Accruent's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 106,909 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,562 · 728 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,999
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 70 text, 42 image, 8 video · 77 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2023, as Accruent LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 53 in the year, 67 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 71 in lease accounting

Segment leader

29%

FinQuery

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 16 answers
Its own site cited: in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Accruent Lucernex

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Accruent Lucernex; a claim can dispute any of them.

Accruent 1Lucernex 1

Follow Accruent Lucernex

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Accruent is the company behind Accruent Lucernex.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Real Estate Management Software
accruent.com/products/lucernex
For: organizations
accruent.com/solutions/lease-accounting-software
Price stated: Custom Pricing accruent.com/products/lucernex
Certifications: SOC 1SOC 2SOC certificationsIFRS 16ASC 842
Customers named: Helzberg DiamondsGenescoBanfield Pet HospitalAMC TheatersRegal Cinemas
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Accruent Lucernex's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: accruent.com/products/lucernex, accruent.com/solutions/lease-accounting-software, accruent.com/solutions/lease-administration-software, accruent.com/solutions/construction-project-management-software, accruent.com/products/lucernex/lx-projects. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Accruent Lucernex's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Accruent Lucernex, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Accruent Lucernex by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Accruent Lucernex is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Accruent Lucernex, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.