AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Aico · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Aico

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Aico was named 3 times in Account reconciliation and 1 other category, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aico for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Account reconciliationAccounting and close0%32 of 820%2under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial consolidationAccounting and close0%72 of 1020%1under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Aico held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Account reconciliation · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 → 30 of 77
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 22 → 30 of 66

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Account reconciliation0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 23 → 32 of 82
Financial consolidation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 72 of 102, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Aico across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aico, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aico was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BlackLine5 of 51Not among the top eight
OneStream2 of 51Not among the top eight
CCH Tagetik2 of 50Not among the top eight
HighRadius2 of 50Not among the top eight
Planful2 of 50Not among the top eight
Prophix2 of 50Not among the top eight
Datarails1 of 51Not among the top eight
Double1 of 51Not among the top eight
Airwallex1 of 50Not among the top eight
Alteryx1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aico. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Aico and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org4
highradius.com3
numeric.io3
prophix.com3
satvasolutions.com3
airwallex.com2
g2.com2
gitnux.org2
guideflow.com2
klippa.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Aico came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on aico.ai
471
subdomains included
Content
434
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer23202025-11-24Revenue recognition, Cash application
Blog14112026-07-22Account reconciliation, Financial close manageme
Webinar or virtual event4302025-10-07Account reconciliation
Comparison802025-09-22
Case study5undated
Template or tool302025-10-16
Report or ebook2undatedAccount reconciliation
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page aico.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Aico

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Aico is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-Powered Financial Close Software That Simplifies R2R
For
large enterprises
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Aico's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: aico.ai, aico.ai/glossary/compliance, aico.ai/glossary/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aico's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aico, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aico by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Aico is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Aico, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aico.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.