AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Double · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Double

24Judge labels
6First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Financial close manageme for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 85 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Double for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial close managementAccounting and close2%9 of 850%6under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Double held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment

Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 88
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 8 → 9 of 77

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Financial close manageme2%2%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 9 of 85

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Double across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels3
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative5 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Under $100/month total | Financial Cents, Double, Xenett, Easy Month End” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · first choice
“Double ($10–$50/client/mo) ... bookkeeping-focused tools strong on transaction review and error detection” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative
“Another option to consider is Double” Mistral Small · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative
“Double (Best for Bookkeepers)” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Double, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Double was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Numeric13 of 247Not among the top eight
FloQast12 of 241Not among the top eight
BlackLine12 of 240Not among the top eight
Financial Cents8 of 242Not among the top eight
Planful6 of 242Not among the top eight
Easy Month End6 of 241Not among the top eight
Xenett6 of 241Not among the top eight
Prophix6 of 240Not among the top eight
LiveFlow5 of 240Not among the top eight
OneStream5 of 240Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Double. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Double and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com17
numeric.io14
learn.g2.com13
prophix.com12
financial-cents.com11
guideflow.com11
dokka.com8
doublehq.comYour site8
getapp.com7
datarails.com6

Ninety-nine of the 107 domain citations in answers naming Double came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

doublehq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Double takes 2% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
135,000 a month (“double”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
350,313 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,860 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,950 · 40 in the top three
Sites linking to it
865
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
17 ads · 13 text, 4 video · 11 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as Benjamin Friedman Stein, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 14 in the year, 3 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
24 answers
Its own site cited
in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on doublehq.com
336
subdomains included
Content
131
counted in the table below
Documentation
146
Product · Integration
2 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog84132026-09-24Financial close manageme, Accounting software
Case study25undated
Comparison962026-09-24
Template or tool4undated
Report or ebook3undated
Glossary or explainer322026-07-31
Conference or event2undated
Webinar or virtual event112026-08-26
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page doublehq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Double

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Double is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered, ledger-integrated close management for accounting firms and teams. Automate manual work, gain real-time visibility, and close the books faster.
For
accounting firms and teams
Price stated
Pay monthly per connected client, with unlimited users. doublehq.com/pricing-plans
Free plan or trial
free trial doublehq.com/pricing-plans
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II Certified
Customers named
Springstead SolutionsAttivo PartnersMCO BookkeepingLivFree Bookkeeping, LLCBrantner Bookkeeping, LLCTrac-1 SolutionsTabzCain Watters & Associates
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Double's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: doublehq.com, doublehq.com/pricing-plans, trust.doublehq.com, doublehq.com/product/ac-mattis-justo-dis-felis-nam-hac-vitae-taciti-nibh, doublehq.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Double's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Double, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Double by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Double is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Double, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at doublehq.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.