Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 36 of 106
1 category · RankedB2Brouter
4Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Global e-invoicing compl for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 136 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business43 of 114
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 136
4%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named B2Brouter for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 4% | 5 of 136 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, B2Brouter held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 of 116, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 5 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated B2Brouter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated B2Brouter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“B2Brouter offers the best balance of genuine compliance features, free tier usability, and rock-bottom pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with free options (Zoho Invoice or B2Brouter) to test compliance needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · first choice
“If zero cost is the priority, look at B2Brouter's free plan” GPT-6 Luna · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as B2Brouter, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and B2Brouter was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as B2Brouter, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and B2Brouter was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named B2Brouter. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named B2Brouter and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
itechguides.com3
klippa.com3
omr.com3
sourceforge.net3
zoho.com3
b2brouter.netYour site2
mindsprint.com2
taxtech500.com2
worksbuddy.ai2
capterra.com1
Twenty-two of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming B2Brouter came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on b2brouter.net
1,289
subdomains included
Content
15
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2025-06-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2019-11-26 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Xrechnung vs zugferd comparison
- 2026-09-09Build vs buy e invoicing compliance for your saas comparison
- 2025-11-20Alternative a hermes comparison
- 2025-06-20Webinars b2brouter webinar or virtual event
- 2025-06-20Webinars b2brouter webinar or virtual event
- 2025-06-20Webinars b2brouter webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page b2brouter.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow B2Brouter
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
B2Brouter is its own company.ShowHide
The company
B2Brouter is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- E-invoicing compliance for global businesses
- For
- Companies, software developers, tax advisors, freelancers
- Price stated
- Nej. Det är helt gratis att gå med i vårt partnerprogram. b2brouter.net/se/partners
- Free plan or trial
- Try our online portal for free; Start for free; Free e-invoicing b2brouter.net/global
- Integrations claimed
- 3 b2brouter.net/global/pricing-integrated-products
- Certifications
- ISO 27001Peppol Access Point Service Providermember of the EESPAPlateforme Agréée (electronic invoicing France)leverantör av Åtkomstpunkt för Peppolverifierad leverantrör av finansministerietmedlem av GENA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting, customers
What B2Brouter's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: b2brouter.net/global, b2brouter.net, b2brouter.net/global/pricing-integrated-products, b2brouter.net/global/features, b2brouter.net/se/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when B2Brouter's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as B2Brouter, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for B2Brouter by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where B2Brouter is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name B2Brouter, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.