Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 85 → 23 of 106
1 category · RankedPagero
78Judge labels
18First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Global e-invoicing compl for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 136 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Pagero →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business11 of 114
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 136
13%25 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 90
18%39 labels
accepted challenger
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pagero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 13% | 3 of 136 | 8% | 25 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pagero held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 116
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 13% → 15%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 of 87, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 6% | 11% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 3 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pagero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pagero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels11
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative18 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels7
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative78 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Pagero Free if you need strict compliance like Peppol right away and volume is low... Pagero edges out for no-risk compliance.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest, most‑balanced e‑invoicing compliance platforms are Tradeshift, Basware, Sovos, Pagero, and Avalara” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · first choice
“Sovos or ONESOURCE Pagero offer the strongest combination of global compliance depth, regulatory expertise” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Pagero or Sovos to protect yourself from heavy non-compliance penalties.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you want to avoid expensive, enterprise-grade indirect tax suites (like Sovos, Avalara, or Pagero's enterprise tiers)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · hard negative
“geared toward larger or multinational businesses, so they are usually *not* the best budget choice” Perplexity Sonar · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pagero, over the 78 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pagero was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pagero, over the 78 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pagero was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pagero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 78 answers that named Pagero and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindsprint.com55
sourceforge.net33
zipdo.co32
thedigitalprojectmanager.com28
highradius.com25
cleartax.com23
tungstenautomation.com22
taxtech500.com21
avalara.com20
worldmetrics.org20
279 of the 279 domain citations in answers naming Pagero came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
thomsonreuters.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pagero takes 13% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
thomsonreuters.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pagero takes 13% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“pagero”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 19 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,055,379 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 250,459 · 24,416 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 97,191
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 41 clicks and $313 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
13%
rank 3 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
- First choices
- 18 across its categories
- Named in
- 78 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 77 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on thomsonreuters.com
36,594
subdomains included
Content
2,553
counted in the table below
Documentation
31,756
Product · Integration
1 · 6
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 905 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | ERP systems, Financial reporting | |
| News or press | 824 | undated | Accounting software | ||
| Report or ebook | 331 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 202 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 95 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 72 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 59 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 41 | undated | |||
| Case study | 14 | 0 | 2024-05-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Ethics of artificial intelligence blog
- 2026-09-23Innovation blog
- 2026-09-01Agentic ai vs generative ai the core differences comparison
- 2026-08-25Benefits of artificial intelligence ai blog
- 2026-02-09Thomson reuters offers an end to end compliance platform for oracle fusion cloud erp users blog
- 2024-05-03Justice technology association and the social impact institute case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page thomsonreuters.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Pagero
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pagero; a claim can dispute any of them.
ONESOURCE Pagero 2ONESOURCE Pagero (by Thomson Reuters) 2Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Pagero 2ONESOURCE Pagero (Thomson Reuters) 1Pagero (Thomson Reuters) 1Pagero Free 1
Follow Pagero
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pagero is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pagero is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Streamline e-invoicing compliance globally with integrated software that centralizes tax data and automates reporting.
- For
- Tax, audit & accounting
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Pagero's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: thomsonreuters.com, thomsonreuters.com/en-ca/help/dt-filecabinet/security/hidd-adduser-dialog.html, thomsonreuters.com/en/products/proview, thomsonreuters.com/en/customer-stories, thomsonreuters.com/en/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pagero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pagero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pagero by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pagero is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pagero, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Pagero is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Pagero is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHidePagero is among the products AI models recommend first in Global e-invoicing compliance this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.