AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Storecove · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Storecove

11Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Storecove was named 6 times in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Storecove for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Global e-invoicing complianceTax and compliance0%49 of 13633%6under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Storecove held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 13 of 106
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 33 of 116, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Global e-invoicing compl0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 33 → 49 of 136

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Storecove across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Invoice Ninja or Storecove are your most affordable true e-invoicing options” Kimi K2 · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · alternative
“Best API-First Solution for Custom Systems: Storecove or Clearvo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative
“Specialized in European e-invoicing compliance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“compare broader platforms such as Storecove—but it uses an API and doesn't publish a simple self-serve price” GPT-6 Luna · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · soft negative
“developer-focused platforms like Storecove charge starting prices of €99+/month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Storecove, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Storecove was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Xero7 of 111Not among the top eight
Zoho Invoice6 of 113Not among the top eight
Avalara E-Invoicing6 of 110Not among the top eight
Sovos Compliance Network6 of 110Not among the top eight
Invoice Ninja5 of 111Not among the top eight
QuickBooks Online5 of 110Not among the top eight
Pagero4 of 111Not among the top eight
FreshBooks4 of 110Not among the top eight
Wave3 of 111Not among the top eight
Billit3 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Storecove. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Storecove and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sourceforge.net6
mindsprint.com5
taxtech500.com5
wifitalents.com5
forbes.com4
klippa.com4
thedigitalprojectmanager.com4
xero.com4
zipdo.co4
acquisition-international.com3

Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Storecove came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

storecove.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Storecove takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“storecove”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 789 a month
Searches its site ranks for
214 · 13 in the top three
Sites linking to it
924
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
20 ads · 7 image, 7 video, 6 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2023, as Storecove, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 17 in the year, 3 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 49 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on storecove.com
24
subdomains included
Content
18
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog16152026-09-23
Report or ebook1undated
Template or tool112026-08-19
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page storecove.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Storecove

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Storecove is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Standard in E‑invoicing
For
businesses and ERP providers worldwide; companies that need e-invoicing and e-reporting compliance
Free plan or trial
Request your free 30-day test account storecove.com
Integrations claimed
30 storecove.com
Certifications
DBNAGENAPEPPOL-Access-Point-certified-providerVIDAiso27001Plateforme
Customers named
censofcertiniavattenfall
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, hosting

What Storecove's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: storecove.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Storecove's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Storecove, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Storecove by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Storecove is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Storecove, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at storecove.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.