| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto accounting | Accounting and close | 27% | 1 of 54 | 13% | 45 | accepted challenger | |
| Stablecoin platforms | Treasury and cash | 4% | 10 of 141 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Bitwave is the strongest choice if your business needs controlled digital-asset accounting across wallets, exchanges, entities, and ledgers” Muse Glimmer 30B · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bitwave (Strongest overall for mid-market B2B) ... Why #1 pick? Balances power and usability for B2B ops without excessive complexity.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“Bitwave or SoftLedger are the top recommendations due to their scalability, ERP integrations, and focus on mid-market needs” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Enterprise-grade subledgers like Bitwave or Cryptio, which offer audit support, DeFi classification, and ERP integrations.” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Bitwave (custom quote, enterprise only)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · hard negative
“such as Bitwave (starting at ~$5,000/month) ... are designed for enterprises and are far too expensive for startups or small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
“positioned for larger/regulated firms—might be overkill/pricey (quote-based) for mid-sized” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“though it may be less accessible for some mid-market companies compared to Cryptoworth” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 158 of the 159 answers that named Bitwave and are not a share of its labels.
572 of the 670 domain citations in answers naming Bitwave came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 307 | 0 | 2023-05-02 | Crypto accounting, Accounting software | |
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2022-04-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page bitwave.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Bitwave's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bitwave.io, bitwave.io/pricing, bitwave.io/security, bitwave.io/solutions/impairment, bitwave.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitwave's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitwave, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitwave by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Bitwave first in Crypto accounting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.