AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Cryptio · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Cryptio

137Judge labels
13First choices
33Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Crypto accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 54 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 43 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Cryptio →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In crypto accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cryptio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Crypto accountingAccounting and close9%5 of 5412%43accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cryptio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cryptio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.503003
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash03115
Perplexity Sonar11013
Grok 4.1 Fast23005
Mistral Small12003
DeepSeek V4 Flash03025
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10012
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX02103
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna12003
Muse Glimmer 30B21104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels5
Paraphrase18 labels3
Comparative35 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels2
Scale-constrained21 labels3
Negative19 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative137 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise-grade subledgers like Bitwave or Cryptio, which offer audit support, DeFi classification, and ERP integrations.” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · first choice
“Use an enterprise sub-ledger like Cryptio, Bitwave, Lukka, Ledgible or TRES when you need GAAP/IFRS journal entries” Muse Glimmer 30B · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Ledgible or Cryptio if: You run a business, hold significant assets, need to reconcile accounts monthly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“For business books and audit-ready sub-ledger, Bitwave and Cryptio lead enterprise sub-ledger accounting.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Crypto accounting · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget (Enterprise tools) - Cryptio (starts ~$449/mo)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · hard negative
“Cryptio (starting at ~$449/month)—are designed for enterprises and are far too expensive for startups or small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
“typically start at higher price points (often $49/mo+ or enterprise-only contracts)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
“positioned more toward growing or enterprise teams rather than tight-budget SMBs” Perplexity Sonar · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cryptio, over the 137 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cryptio was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bitwave113 of 13738Compare →
TRES Finance70 of 1376Not among the top eight
CoinTracker33 of 1372Not among the top eight
TaxBit31 of 1370Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cryptio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 136 of the 137 answers that named Cryptio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spark.money88
bitwave.io72
coinledger.io70
fitsmallbusiness.com69
breezing.io64
g2.com54
tres.finance54
milkroad.com53
techdogs.com45
cryptoworth.com43

612 of the 612 domain citations in answers naming Cryptio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cryptio.co ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cryptio takes 9% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “crypto accounting platform”
2
Position for “crypto accounting platforms”
3
Searches for its name, Google
201,000 a month (“cryptio”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 187 a month
Searches its site ranks for
85 · 7 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,450
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 6 text · 6 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2022, as cryptio, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
9%
rank 5 of 54 in crypto accounting
Segment leader
27%
Bitwave
First choices
13 across its categories
Named in
137 answers
Its own site cited
in 136 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cryptio.co
121
subdomains included
Content
115
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog10812026-07-23Crypto accounting, Accounting software
Report or ebook3undated
Case study1undated
Comparison1undated
Template or tool1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cryptio.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Cryptio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cryptio is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
We offer enterprise-grade accounting, reporting, and audit software for your digital assets.
For
enterprise back office; finance teams managing complex, multi-entity digital asset operations in NetSuite; regulated institutions
Certifications
SOC 1 & SOC 2 Type II certified
Customers named
Justin WongTamara SchulzSidra Pervaiz
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Cryptio's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cryptio.co. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cryptio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cryptio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cryptio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cryptio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cryptio, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cryptio.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.