AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › CoinLedger · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

CoinLedger

55Judge labels
5First choices
17Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Crypto accounting for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 54 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CoinLedger →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In crypto accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CoinLedger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Crypto accountingAccounting and close4%8 of 5414%21accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoinLedger yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoinLedger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast20002
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX11013
MiniMax M2.511002
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative16 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels4
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative19 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with CoinTracking (free tier) or CoinLedger ($49)—test free imports first.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“For personal taxes, start with Koinly or CoinLedger (free previews available).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“CoinLedger = Best overall for CPAs and TurboTax users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with Koinly or CoinLedger” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“rated poorly by professional accountants because they frequently misclassify complex transactions” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cautions: - Enterprise governance and close workflows are limited” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“they are not true double-entry subledgers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoinLedger, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoinLedger was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ZenLedger23 of 550Not among the top eight
TRES Finance22 of 554Not among the top eight
CoinTracker21 of 550Not among the top eight
CoinTracking17 of 551Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoinLedger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 55 answers that named CoinLedger and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spark.money37
coinledger.ioYour site36
fitsmallbusiness.com35
g2.com27
breezing.io24
cryptoworth.com24
gitnux.org23
tres.finance22
milkroad.com21
bitwave.io17

230 of the 266 domain citations in answers naming CoinLedger came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

coinledger.io ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CoinLedger takes 4% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “crypto accounting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “crypto accounting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“coinledger”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
81 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 124,477 a month
Searches its site ranks for
8,610 · 1,396 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,091
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 66 text, 46 video, 8 image · 98 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as Coin Ledger, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 5 in the year, 115 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 54 in crypto accounting
Segment leader
27%
Bitwave
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
55 answers
Its own site cited
in 55 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on coinledger.io
10,008
subdomains included
Content
713
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
0 · 793
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Template or tool33402024-10-21Accounting software, Crypto accounting
Blog176272026-10-01Crypto accounting, Accounting software
Glossary or explainer13802026-06-01Crypto accounting
Comparison5002024-09-17
Report or ebook1512026-09-10
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page coinledger.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as CoinLedger

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoinLedger; a claim can dispute any of them.
CoinLedger (formerly CryptoTrader.Tax) 1

Follow CoinLedger

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CoinLedger is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The #1 crypto tax software and prep firm. Built to save you time & maximize your refund.
For
cryptocurrency user
Price stated
CoinLedger costs $49-199 for standard tax reports. coinledger.io
Starting price
49 coinledger.io
Free plan or trial
You can import your data and preview your tax report for free. coinledger.io
Integrations claimed
1000 coinledger.io
Hosting
United StatesAustraliaCanadaNew ZealandGermanyJapanIrelandAustria
Customers named
BloombergThe New York TimesTurboTaxForbesAccountingTodayCoindesk
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What CoinLedger's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: coinledger.io, coinledger.io/pricing, coinledger.io/security, coinledger.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoinLedger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoinLedger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoinLedger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CoinLedger is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CoinLedger, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coinledger.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.