| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto accounting | Accounting and close | 4% | 8 of 54 | 14% | 21 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with CoinTracking (free tier) or CoinLedger ($49)—test free imports first.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“For personal taxes, start with Koinly or CoinLedger (free previews available).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“CoinLedger = Best overall for CPAs and TurboTax users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with Koinly or CoinLedger” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“rated poorly by professional accountants because they frequently misclassify complex transactions” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cautions: - Enterprise governance and close workflows are limited” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“they are not true double-entry subledgers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 55 answers that named CoinLedger and are not a share of its labels.
230 of the 266 domain citations in answers naming CoinLedger came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 334 | 0 | 2024-10-21 | Accounting software, Crypto accounting | |
| Blog | 176 | 27 | 2026-10-01 | Crypto accounting, Accounting software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 138 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | Crypto accounting | |
| Comparison | 50 | 0 | 2024-09-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 15 | 1 | 2026-09-10 |
Every page coinledger.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What CoinLedger's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: coinledger.io, coinledger.io/pricing, coinledger.io/security, coinledger.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoinLedger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoinLedger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoinLedger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: