| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto accounting | Accounting and close | 4% | 9 of 54 | 8% | 13 | accepted challenger | |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 39 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SoftLedger is the safer default recommendation because it appears better aligned to mid-market needs and pricing expectations” Perplexity Sonar · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Bitwave or SoftLedger are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top G2 for mid-market multi-entity; automation emphasis. | Newer player, fewer integrations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · alternative
“SoftLedger is another option, starting at $45–$750 per month” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Full ledger replacement, but pricier (~$13k+/yr).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 62 answers that named SoftLedger and are not a share of its labels.
270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming SoftLedger came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 131 | 4 | 2026-09-09 | Accounting software, Expense management | |
| Comparison | 13 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | Accounting software | |
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2025-06-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | undated | Accounting software | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2023-10-11 |
Every page softledger.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name accounting software (26); 0 name its categories the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What SoftLedger's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: softledger.com, softledger.com/plans, trust.softledger.com, softledger.com/case-studies, softledger.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SoftLedger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SoftLedger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SoftLedger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: