AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › SoftLedger · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

SoftLedger

62Judge labels
7First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Crypto accounting for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 54 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SoftLedger →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In crypto accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SoftLedger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Crypto accountingAccounting and close4%9 of 548%13accepted challenger
Financial consolidationAccounting and close0%39 of 1020%2under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SoftLedger yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SoftLedger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels2
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative12 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative62 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SoftLedger is the safer default recommendation because it appears better aligned to mid-market needs and pricing expectations” Perplexity Sonar · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Bitwave or SoftLedger are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top G2 for mid-market multi-entity; automation emphasis. | Newer player, fewer integrations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · alternative
“SoftLedger is another option, starting at $45–$750 per month” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Full ledger replacement, but pricier (~$13k+/yr).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SoftLedger, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SoftLedger was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TRES Finance21 of 620Not among the top eight
TaxBit12 of 621Not among the top eight
Lukka8 of 620Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SoftLedger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 62 answers that named SoftLedger and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spark.money40
fitsmallbusiness.com35
breezing.io33
coinledger.io33
g2.com30
bitwave.io24
itechguides.com19
milkroad.com19
tres.finance19
cryptoworth.com18

270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming SoftLedger came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

softledger.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SoftLedger takes 4% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “crypto accounting platform”
5
Position for “crypto accounting platforms”
1
Searches for its name, Google
210 a month (“softledger”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,872 a month
Searches its site ranks for
696 · 42 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,713
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 6 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2026, as Soft Ledger, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 6 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 54 in crypto accounting
Segment leader
27%
Bitwave
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
62 answers
Its own site cited
in 62 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on softledger.com
448
subdomains included
Content
162
counted in the table below
Documentation
213
Product · Integration
0 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog13142026-09-09Accounting software, Expense management
Comparison1312026-08-20Accounting software
Case study1002025-06-25
Glossary or explainer5undatedAccounting software
Template or tool212026-08-20
Podcast or video102023-10-11
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page softledger.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name accounting software (26); 0 name its categories the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SoftLedger

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SoftLedger is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise accounting software with real-time multi-entity consolidation, automated close, and a full API. SoftLedger scales with your business.
For
Modern multi-entity businesses
Price stated
SoftLedger offers Standard and Enterprise plans to match your growth plans. softledger.com
Starting price
750 softledger.com/plans
Certifications
SOC 1 Type II
Customers named
OnMessageInfinity RisingArk FinancialPowerKatonaOrchidGaingelsEcogy Energy
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What SoftLedger's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: softledger.com, softledger.com/plans, trust.softledger.com, softledger.com/case-studies, softledger.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SoftLedger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SoftLedger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SoftLedger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SoftLedger is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SoftLedger, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at softledger.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.