Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 48 → 71 of 79
6 categories · RankedBoard
89Judge labels
2First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in FP&A platforms for enterprise buyers
Rank 22 of 74 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Board →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business71 of 80
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 74
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 57
2%22 labels
accepted challenger
In fp&a platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Board for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 22 of 74 | 20% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 26 of 99 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 29 of 102 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 84 of 101 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 44 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 45 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Board held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · FP&A platforms · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 18 → 23 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 5 → 7 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 22 of 74 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 26 of 99 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 29 of 102 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 101, unchanged |
| Board | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 85 → 44 of 99 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 45 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Board across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Board across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative33 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative17 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative89 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Board if you want a single platform for planning plus reporting and governance.” Perplexity Sonar · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative
“Unified agentic planning platform connecting planning, close, consolidation, and reporting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative
“if you need a more enterprise-grade connected planning and dashboarding platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“offer the right balance of consolidation depth and manageable implementation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users report potential privacy concerns, customer service is slow to respond, and the interface may not be intuitive” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
“Adaptive Planning, Board, and traditional financial planning & analysis (FP&A) suites... designed "top-down"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Board is generally more complex to configure than Cube or Prophix and can be expensive.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · direct prompt · soft negative
“Anaplan / OneStream / Board — Probably overkill at 500 employees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FP&A platforms · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Board, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Board was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Board, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Board was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Board. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 88 of the 89 answers that named Board and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
board.comYour site35
cubesoftware.com33
drivetrain.ai30
learn.g2.com30
prophix.com30
g2.com28
getaleph.com26
worldmetrics.org24
gartner.com23
golimelight.com23
247 of the 282 domain citations in answers naming Board came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
board.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Board takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
board.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Board takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “fp&a software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “fp&a platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90,500 a month (“board”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 612,482 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 44,405 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,620 · 154 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,322
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 74 in FP&A platforms
Segment leader
20%
Planful
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 89 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 88 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on board.com
5,023
subdomains included
Content
1,350
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
8 · 39
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 444 | 4 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Blog | 338 | 18 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Podcast or video | 167 | 19 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Case study | 162 | 5 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 119 | 15 | 2027-04-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 62 | 0 | 2024-10-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 32 | 2 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 19 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2026-05-05 |
Most recent
- 2027-04-21Retail technology show 2027 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-11-04Fpa trends webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-28Retail breakfast nyc webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-27Nyc cfo executive summit webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-22See the board supply chain agent in action webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-22Ibf orlando 2026 webinar or virtual event
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 15, 2026Board Beyond Roma 2026 | Agentic Planning e AIPalazzo Ripetta, Roma, Italy · hosts
- October 15, 2026Board Beyond Roadshow South Africa 2026Adapt IT Johannesburg Campus, Midrand, South Africa · hosts
Last twelve months
- September 16, 2026Board Beyond Roadshow Nordics 2026Tändstickspalatset, Stockholm, Sweden · hosted
- reported December 2025Gartner Supply Chain Symposium/Xpo™ conferenceLondon · attended
As the event pages on board.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page board.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Board
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Board; a claim can dispute any of them.
Board International 2Board (formerly Board.com) 1Jedox/Board 1
Follow Board
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Board is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Board is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Agentic Planning Platform / The Enterprise Planning Platform
- For
- financial and operational teams
- Price stated
- we'd love to discuss your specific challenges and provide a customized quote to suit your needs board.com/pricing
- Customers named
- Groupe SEBL'ORÉAL GroupThe Very GroupVelcro CompaniesKraft HeinzWhataburgerL’ORÉAL GroupDFL – Deutsche Fußball Liga GmbH
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Board's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: board.com, board.com/pricing, board.com/blog/tag/security, board.com/platform, board.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Board's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Board, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Board by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Board is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Board, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.