Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 85 → 100 of 101
Oracle Fusion · 5 categories · RankedOracle Fusion Cloud EPM
291Judge labels
25First choices
99Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Corporate performance ma for enterprise buyers
Rank 97 of 99 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 53% of its 47 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business115 of 116
0%36 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market97 of 99
0%47 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 73
24%63 labels
accepted challenger
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 97 of 99 | 53% | 47 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 28 of 102 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 31 of 74 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 23 of 82 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 74 of 77 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Excel at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 92 → 90 of 91
Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 17% → 24%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 92 → 97 of 99 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 88 → 28 of 102 |
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 31 of 74 |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 23 of 82 |
| Financial modeling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 114 → 74 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct56 labels9
Paraphrase35 labels1
Comparative66 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained52 labels13
Scale-constrained27 labels2
Negative55 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative291 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 36 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Comprehensive end-to-end ...; Leader in Gartner Financial Planning Magic Quadrant (2024/2025, highest ability to execute)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Oracle leads the market with a comprehensive suite designed for large enterprises” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Pick Oracle EPM Cloud for the broadest enterprise finance coverage.” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Oracle and Anaplan are top choices for large, complex organizations” Mistral Small · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget | Oracle / SAP / Anaplan | Require major (often $100K+) implementation projects” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“You want to avoid legacy giants (like Oracle or SAP) due to their high licensing and consulting costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Anaplan, OneStream, or Oracle EPM Cloud if you have a limited budget” Kimi K2 · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“"| Oracle EPM Cloud | $150–$500+/user/month | Enterprise-grade with high implementation costs"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, over the 288 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, over the 288 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 273 of the 288 answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onestream.com102
drivetrain.ai96
cubesoftware.com78
prophix.com77
g2.com66
gartner.com63
golimelight.com54
peoplegoal.com51
learn.g2.com48
oracle.comYour site48
635 of the 683 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
oracle.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
oracle.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “epm software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “epm platforms”
1
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“oracle fusion cloud epm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- oracle.com shared with Oracle Fusion's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,410,638 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 280,257 · 54,144 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 265,940
- Paid Google search
- 9 searches its ads show for, about 43 clicks and $247 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 97 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
- First choices
- 25 across its categories
- Named in
- 288 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 273 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Cloud EPM 18Oracle EPM Cloud 18Oracle EPM 8Oracle 7Oracle Cloud EPM (Fusion) 1Oracle Cloud EPM (formerly Hyperion/HFM) 1Oracle Cloud EPM Planning 1Oracle EPM Cloud / Oracle EPM 1Oracle EPM Cloud / Oracle Hyperion 1Oracle Netsuite / Oracle Cloud EPM 1
Follow Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle Fusion is the company behind Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.ShowHide
The company
Oracle Fusion is the company behind Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) software helps you analyze, understand, and report on your business.
- For
- CFOs and the office of finance
- Customers named
- GloboGrupo GloboArgoMontefioreSRAM
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/performance-management/what-is-epm, oracle.com/customers/globo-oracle-fusion-cloud-erp, oracle.com/performance-management/financial-consolidation-close, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-cloud-epm-market/89350/90422, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-cloud-epm-customer/89350/90385. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.