AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Centage · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Centage

37Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in FP&A platforms for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 74 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Centage →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In fp&a platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Centage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
FP&A platformsPlanning and analysis4%7 of 746%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Corporate performance managementPlanning and analysis0%36 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Centage held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · FP&A platforms · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 14 → 20 of 79
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 10 → 7 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 30 → 32 of 54

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
FP&A platforms2%4%▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 7 of 74
Corporate performance ma0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 53 → 36 of 99

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Centage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast02103
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash02013
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00202
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase7 labels3
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Centage: Ideal for mid-market finance teams with revenues between $25M and $500M.” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · direct prompt · first choice
“Centage – purpose-built for your size range” Kimi K2 · FP&A platforms · scale prompt · first choice
“Centage and Jirav win at the small end, where the buyer actually gets a published price” Muse Glimmer 30B · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“Want low-complexity budgeting/forecasting without enterprise overhead → Centage” Muse Glimmer 30B · FP&A platforms · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Options to Avoid ... Centage — Starts around $1,750–$2,250/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Centage, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Centage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Anaplan22 of 370Not among the top eight
Datarails21 of 372Not among the top eight
Workday Adaptive Planning19 of 373Not among the top eight
Jirav15 of 373Not among the top eight
Prophix15 of 371Not among the top eight
Pigment13 of 371Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Centage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 37 answers that named Centage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

centage.comYour site24
cubesoftware.com22
getaleph.com21
learn.g2.com20
resources.rework.com17
golimelight.com16
prophix.com16
drivetrain.ai14
datarails.com13
cledara.com12

151 of the 175 domain citations in answers naming Centage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

centage.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Centage takes 4% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “fp&a software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “fp&a platforms”
5
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“centage”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
11 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,692 a month
Searches its site ranks for
444 · 25 in the top three
Sites linking to it
925
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
10 ads · 9 text, 1 image · 6 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as Centage Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 3 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 74 in FP&A platforms
Segment leader
20%
Planful
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
37 answers
Its own site cited
in 36 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on centage.com
695
subdomains included
Content
608
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
21 · 21
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog496undatedCash flow forecasting, FP&A platforms
News or press43undated
Comparison29undatedFP&A platforms
Case study22undatedCash flow forecasting, FP&A platforms
Podcast or video9undated
Report or ebook4undated
Glossary or explainer3undated
Template or tool2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page centage.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name cash flow forecasting (13); 11 name its categories the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Centage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Centage is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
FP&A software that helps finance teams automate budgeting, forecasting, and reporting—without the complexity of enterprise tools.
For
finance teams at growing companies
Price stated
Tailored pricing to your business. Starting at: $699/month centage.com
Starting price
$699/month centage.com
Integrations claimed
7 centage.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type I
Hosting
North America
Customers named
Risk StrategiesCommunity Care, Inc.Big Blue Marble AcademyHASCOPrice Family VineyardsPrice Family Vineyards & EstatesHousing Authority of Snohomish CountyCarroll County Memorial Hospital
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial

What Centage's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: centage.com, centage.com/pricing, trust.centage.com, centage.com/product/advisors, centage.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Centage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Centage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Centage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Centage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Centage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at centage.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.