Every category where a model named CoinTracking for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	2%	11 of 54	20%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoinTracking yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoinTracking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CoinTracking is a top crypto tax software pick combining tax reporting, portfolio tracking, broad integration support” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice

“Start with CoinTracking (free tier) or CoinLedger ($49)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · first choice

“The "power user's choice" with the most granular control” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Cointracking (Best for Active Traders)” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“generally more of a tracking and tax tool than a full accounting subledger... I'm not citing this one because I didn't pull a current official source” GPT-5.4 mini · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · soft negative

“*Caution for long-term users due to pricing traps and API issues*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoinTracking, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoinTracking was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Koinly23 of 2312Not among the top eight

CoinLedger17 of 234Not among the top eight

Cryptio12 of 230Not among the top eight

Bitwave10 of 232Not among the top eight

Cryptoworth10 of 231Not among the top eight

TokenTax10 of 230Not among the top eight

ZenLedger9 of 230Not among the top eight

TRES Finance8 of 232Not among the top eight

TaxBit8 of 231Not among the top eight

CoinTracker8 of 230Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoinTracking. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named CoinTracking and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spark.money16

fitsmallbusiness.com14

g2.com13

koinly.io10

coinledger.io9

gitnux.org9

tres.finance9

cryptoworth.com8

rfp.wiki8

breezing.io7

No domain is on file for CoinTracking, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

spark.money/tools/crypto-accounting-software-comparison16

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cryptocurrency-accounting-software14

g2.com/categories/crypto-accounting12

gitnux.org/best/blockchain-accounting-software8

coinledger.io/tools/best-crypto-accounting-software6

cryptolicenses.net/crypto-accounting/software6

koinly.io/blog/compare-crypto-tax-software6

coinbureau.com/services/crypto-tax-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where CoinTracking stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 14,800 a month (“cointracking”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 338 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 54 in crypto accounting

Segment leader

27%

Bitwave

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as CoinTracking

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoinTracking; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cointracking 1

Follow CoinTracking

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoinTracking's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoinTracking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoinTracking by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CoinTracking is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CoinTracking, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.