| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 36 of 124 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 62 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 41 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 66 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 36 of 124 |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 82, unchanged |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 85, unchanged |
| Board | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 66 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Concourse offers a unique model that makes it highly accessible for startups or bootstrapped companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · alternative
“Choose Concourse or Basis if month-end close and accounting-review automation are your main goals.” GPT-5.4 mini · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Concourse offers a free plan, making it the most cost-effective starting point” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Concourse and are not a share of its labels.
Twenty-one of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Concourse came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 61 | 35 | 2026-09-28 | Cash flow forecasting, Account reconciliation | |
| Comparison | 10 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated |
Every page concourse.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Concourse's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: concourse.ai, concourse.ai/security, concourse.ai/customers, concourse.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Concourse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Concourse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Concourse by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: