Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 14 → 94 of 94
Diligent · 1 category · RankedDiligent Entities
158Judge labels
26First choices
69Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
50% in Entity management for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 81 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 46% of its 56 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Diligent Entities →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business99 of 99
0%43 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market3 of 81
8%56 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 89
50%59 labels
endorsed leader
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Diligent Entities for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 8% | 3 of 81 | 46% | 56 | criticized challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Diligent Entities held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Entity management · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 6 → 2 of 79
Enterprise▲+12Since September 2026: 39% → 51%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
51%from 39% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 2 pointsRank 1 of 77, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | 5% | 10% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 3 of 81 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Diligent Entities across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Diligent Entities across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labels13
Paraphrase27 labels11
Comparative27 labels11not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels2
Scale-constrained21 labelsNone
Negative34 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative158 labels in all, every segment counted; 26 of the 39 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Large enterprises... Market-leading security protocols... 150+ entities or complex global structures: Diligent Entities or CSC provide enterprise-grade capabilities” Kimi K2 · Entity management · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you're a large multinational with 150+ entities across many jurisdictions → Diligent Entities or CSC provide the deepest enterprise governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · first choice
“Diligent Entities and CSC Entity Management are frequently recommended due to their scalability” Mistral Small · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Diligent if you want entity management plus broader governance/risk workflows.” GPT-5.4 mini · Entity management · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid: Diligent Entities — While powerful, it's typically over-engineered and overpriced for mid-market” Kimi K2 · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“"What to Avoid: Diligent Entities and similar enterprise solutions - typically start at $15,000-$50,000/year"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Entity management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier options like Diligent Entities or CSC (enterprise-level, $100s+ per entity/month)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid giants like EntityKeeper or Diligent unless you are prepared to pay $5,000+/year” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Diligent Entities, over the 156 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent Entities was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Diligent Entities, over the 156 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent Entities was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diligent Entities. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 151 of the 156 answers that named Diligent Entities and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com79
discern.com72
techbullion.com64
getapp.com59
diligent.comYour site57
itechguides.com47
sourceforge.net47
softwareadvice.com46
worldmetrics.org46
commenda.io44
504 of the 561 domain citations in answers naming Diligent Entities came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
diligent.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Diligent Entities takes 8% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
diligent.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Diligent Entities takes 8% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “entity management tools”
3
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“diligent entities”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Its company's site
- diligent.com shared with Diligent's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 317,551 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,994 · 2,292 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,276
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 21 clicks and $287 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 3 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
- First choices
- 26 across its categories
- Named in
- 156 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 151 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Diligent Entities
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diligent Entities; a claim can dispute any of them.
Diligent 9Athennian/Diligent Entities 1Diligent Entities (formerly Blueprint OneWorld) 1
Follow Diligent Entities
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Diligent is the company behind Diligent Entities.ShowHide
The company
Diligent is the company behind Diligent Entities.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Diligent
- Diligent Boards, Diligent Corporation, Diligent ESG, Diligent Equity, Diligent One Platform
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-enhanced entity management software for faster, sharper oversight
- For
- legal, tax and compliance teams
- Price stated
- Request pricing diligent.com/products/entities
- Customers named
- FortiveAlltech
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Diligent Entities's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: diligent.com/products/entities, developer.diligent.com/api/entities, diligent.com/products/de/entities, diligent.com/products/fr/entities, diligent.com/de/products/entities-de. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent Entities's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent Entities, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Diligent Entities by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Diligent Entities is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Diligent Entities, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Diligent Entities is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Diligent Entities is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideDiligent Entities is among the products AI models recommend first in Entity management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.