AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › eBrands · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

eBrands

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. eBrands was named 1 time in Merchants of record, where Paddle led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business40 of 54
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market33 of 45
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise33 of 63
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In merchants of record · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named eBrands for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Merchants of recordReceivables and billing0%33 of 450%1under 10 labels · led by Paddle at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for eBrands yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated eBrands across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as eBrands, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and eBrands was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Paddle3 of 32Not among the top eight
FastSpring3 of 30Not among the top eight
Lemon Squeezy2 of 30Not among the top eight
Polar2 of 30Not among the top eight
Stripe2 of 30Not among the top eight
2Checkout1 of 30Not among the top eight
2Checkout / Verifone1 of 30Not among the top eight
Avalara1 of 30Not among the top eight
BlueSnap1 of 30Not among the top eight
Cleverbridge1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named eBrands. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named eBrands and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

freemius.com3
guideflow.com3
dodopayments.com2
ebrands.comYour site2
grow.cleverbridge.com2
merchantofrecordfinder.com2
paddle.com2
promoteproject.com2
shopify.com2
stripe.com2

Twenty of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming eBrands came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

freemius.com/blog/best-merchant-of-record-providers-saas-stage3
guideflow.com/blog/merchant-of-record-software3
dodopayments.com/blogs/best-merchant-of-record-platforms2
ebrands.com/blog-posts/merchant-of-record-companies-compared2
merchantofrecordfinder.com/directory2
paddle.com/resources/how-to-evaluate-a-merchant-of-record2
promoteproject.com/article/228764/which-merchant-of-record-platforms-actually-accept-physi2
adyen.com/knowledge-hub/merchant-of-record1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ebrands.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, eBrands takes 0% of first choices and Paddle takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “merchant of record”
5
Position for “merchants of record”
–
not in the top ten

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 33 of 45 in merchants of record
Segment leader
28%
Paddle
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
3 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ebrands.com
535
subdomains included
Content
152
counted in the table below
Documentation
68
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog6512026-08-06Merchants of record
Glossary or explainer6502026-04-22Merchants of record
Case study1102022-11-22
Comparison1002026-05-27Merchants of record
Conference or event1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ebrands.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as eBrands

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as eBrands; a claim can dispute any of them.
eBrands/ESW 1

Follow eBrands

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

eBrands is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Global Growth Platform & Merchant of Record
ebrands.com
For
consumer brands
ebrands.com
Integrations claimed
100 ebrands.com
Certifications
CEUKCA
Hosting
European UnionUnited KingdomUnited StatesCanadaAustralia
Customers named
Striking VikingOpen GoaaalMysodaLuxLuonkosBodyoticsIndoCoach Soak
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial

What eBrands's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ebrands.com, ebrands.com/compliance, ebrands.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when eBrands's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as eBrands, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for eBrands by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where eBrands is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name eBrands, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ebrands.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.