Small business▼−11Since September 2026: 13% → 2%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 13% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 9 of 106
1 category · Named, not rankedExecutESG
7Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ExecutESG was named 2 times in ESG and carbon reporting, where Greenly led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 110
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 110
3%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ExecutESG for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | Equity and corporate | 3% | 10 of 110 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Greenly at 36% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ExecutESG held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ESG and carbon reporting · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 9 of 96
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | 6% | 4% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 10 of 110 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ExecutESG across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ExecutESG across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels3
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ExecutESG (Best Free Software): ExecutESG offers a permanently free tier built around the European EFRAG Voluntary SME (VSME) sustainability standard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice
“ExecutESG is currently the standout recommendation due to its permanently free tier and transparent pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ExecutESG, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ExecutESG was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ExecutESG, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ExecutESG was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ExecutESG. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named ExecutESG and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
executesg.comYour site7
manglai.io5
onestopesg.com5
esgsoftwareindex.com4
g2.com4
coolset.com3
sourceforge.net3
toolradar.com3
brightest.io2
carbonmarketnetwork.com2
Thirty-one of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming ExecutESG came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
executesg.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ExecutESG takes 3% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
executesg.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ExecutESG takes 3% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “esg reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “esg reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“executesg”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 14 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 123
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 10 of 110 in ESG and carbon reporting
Segment leader
36%
Greenly
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on executesg.com
519
subdomains included
Content
405
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
7 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 294 | 132 | 2026-10-06 | ESG and carbon reporting, Accounting software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 81 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | 19 | 2026-09-29 | Accounting software | |
| Report or ebook | 4 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-22 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-06Nordic erp carbon accounting netvisor procountor fortnox blog
- 2026-10-05Accounting firm esg advisory revenue playbook blog
- 2026-10-03Audit proof esg general ledger voucher xbrl blog
- 2026-10-02Green financing sme bank loans accounting esg blog
- 2026-10-01Cfo guide vsme internal controls sustainability reporting blog
- 2026-09-30Universal csv general ledger esg migration guide blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page executesg.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ExecutESG
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ExecutESG is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ExecutESG is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sustainability & Strategy Platform
- For
- European SMEs
- Price stated
- Free ESG Readiness Assessment; VS (VSME) Core €41 /mo; VS (VSME) Pro €108 /mo; Corporate DMA & Lead €408 /mo executesg.com
- Starting price
- 41 executesg.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Forever Tier; Free ESG Readiness Assessment; Start 14-Day Trial executesg.com
- Integrations claimed
- 2 executesg.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPR compliant
- Hosting
- EU
- Customers named
- Veljekset ToivanenTOPPISTORMOSSENSSA ToimitilatMARIA 01Veljekset Toivanen Oy
What ExecutESG's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: executesg.com, executesg.com/pricing, executesg.com/platform, executesg.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ExecutESG's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ExecutESG, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ExecutESG by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ExecutESG is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ExecutESG, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.