AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Persefoni · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Persefoni

79Judge labels
8First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in ESG and carbon reporting for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 110 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Persefoni →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Persefoni for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
ESG and carbon reportingEquity and corporate5%4 of 1103%30accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Persefoni held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · ESG and carbon reporting · by segment

Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 4 → 11 of 106
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 96
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 75

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ESG and carbon reporting6%4%▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 7 → 4 of 110

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Persefoni across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast03003
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash03003
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash21003
Kimi K202103
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna03003
Muse Glimmer 30B10203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels1
Paraphrase28 labels5
Comparative22 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels2
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative79 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Watershed or Persefoni if: Your primary immediate pain point is calculating Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions accurately” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start for free with carbon + basic reporting: Persefoni Pro.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for a mid-sized B2B company: Persefoni” GPT-5.4 mini · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Recommendation: Persefoni” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“good for complex organizations, but may be overkill for mid-sized” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Persefoni, over the 79 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Persefoni was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
IBM Envizi32 of 790Not among the top eight
Sphera22 of 790Not among the top eight
Normative20 of 790Not among the top eight
Microsoft Cloud for Sustainability19 of 790Not among the top eight
Diligent ESG16 of 790Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Persefoni. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 78 of the 79 answers that named Persefoni and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

onestopesg.com45
persefoni.comYour site32
coolset.com26
greenly.earth22
techtarget.com22
fanruan.com20
tracera.com20
g2.com19
linkedin.com19
pulsora.com19

212 of the 244 domain citations in answers naming Persefoni came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

persefoni.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Persefoni takes 5% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “esg reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “esg reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“persefoni”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
23 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 8,274 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,239 · 117 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,677
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $3 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
29 ads · 28 text, 1 image · 26 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2023, as Persefoni AI Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 2 in the year, 27 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 4 of 110 in ESG and carbon reporting
Segment leader
36%
Greenly
First choices
8 across its categories
Named in
79 answers
Its own site cited
in 78 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on persefoni.com
3,372
subdomains included
Content
860
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
14 · 12
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog597122026-09-24Accounting software
Conference or event12102025-06-26
Podcast or video46undated
Case study41undated
Webinar or virtual event2502025-05-22
Glossary or explainer1402026-05-07
Comparison802025-07-28
News or press6undated
Template or tool222026-09-22

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page persefoni.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Persefoni

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Persefoni; a claim can dispute any of them.
Persefoni Pro 3

Follow Persefoni

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Persefoni is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Carbon Accounting and Sustainability Management Platform
For
Businesses of all sizes and complexities; financial services companies; customers, investors, and regulators
Price stated
Free persefoni.com/pricing
Starting price
Free persefoni.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Sign up free persefoni.com
Certifications
SOC-2 CompliantSOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27017
Customers named
XeroxCaliberNateraPittsburgh PenguinsAt HomeFM ConwayCGE PartnersWorkiva
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Persefoni's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: persefoni.com, persefoni.com/pricing, trust.persefoni.com, persefoni.com/use-cases/sec, persefoni.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Persefoni's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Persefoni, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Persefoni by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Persefoni is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Persefoni, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at persefoni.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.